Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Tearing my hair out - I am thoroughly disgusted with VS.NET

2002-11-10 Thread Bruce Hearn
In trying to come up with a build approach that attempts to avoid the 64k problem, I think I've found an approach that should work for us. I have tested it with a solution containing 50 projects, several of them over 64k. a) use file references everywhere and set "copy local" to false for all ref

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET Framework 1.1 - more detailed changes info?

2002-11-10 Thread Shawn Wildermuth
This is usally more in the "its faster, honest" category. I know that they really took the security stuff seriously in the 1.1 framework, but I doubt you'll ever get a feature list of what they changed. The real answer is how much faster do your existing apps work? Specifically I think they did

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] BUG: Serialization of decimals less than 1E-4

2002-11-10 Thread Sowmy Srinivasan
The decimal bug and many of the serialization bugs listed in http://www.jelovic.com/dotnetbugs/ are fixed in .NET framework 1.1. (Beta available for download from http://msdn.microsoft.com). Sowmy -Original Message- From: D

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET Framework 1.1 - more detailed changes info?

2002-11-10 Thread Dave Adair
According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/productinfo/next/overview.asp "significant improvements have been made to the .NET Framework in the areas of scalability and performance." Is there a list anywhere with more information on what those improvements are exactly? I have 1.1 install