Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Intellisense tooltips--why separate file?

2002-12-11 Thread Dominic Cooney
Roy, Microsoft provides a great tool for writing XML comment files for VB. It is at http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnvssam p/html/vbcs_XMLComments.asp . In fact, I prefer it than writing XML comments in line and use it for writing all of my C# documentation! You

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Intellisense tooltips--why separate file?

2002-12-11 Thread Eric Gunnerson
The big issue is one of size. The XML comments for an assembly are often as big as the assembly itself, so embedding them inside of the assembly would roughly double the size of the system assemblies. Which would be bad. -Original Message- From: Pardee, Roy E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Julian Skinner
You've probably checked this, but just in case: have you made sure that you've set the From property of the MailMessage. I can't remember the exact error you get if you don't set it, but I seem to remember it's something misleading that looks a bit like a CDO config error... Cheers, Julian Julian

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Intellisense tooltips--why separate file?

2002-12-11 Thread Pardee, Roy E
I'm a vb programmer who just discovered that you need to create a separate xml file in order to provide intellisense tooltips for your classes & that there's no (ms-provided) way of automatically doing so. I'm bitter about it of course 8^) but mostly I'm curious about why ms chose to implement the

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Urs Eichmann
You shouldn't install Outlook on a server. If you do, you'll have problems if you run Exchange Server on the same machine. Urs -Original Message- From: Frederic Gos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 4:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] W

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread JustinPitts
Web.Mail does depend upon CDO. If you do not wish to depend upon CDO for SMTP client capabilities, then you can purchase something like IPWorks for .Net http://www.nsoftware.com/products/showprod.aspx?part=IPN5-A or you can try an open source solution like OpenSmtp http://sourceforge.net/projects

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Writing VS.NET Tools

2002-12-11 Thread Shawn Wildermuth
Thanks Jon! Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth Author of "Pragmatic ADO.NET" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://adoguy.com/book http://ONDotNet.com > -Original Message- > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Flanders > Sent: Wednesday, December 1

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Brady Gaster
Make sure you are telling the SmtpMail object which server to use to send the mail. Brady Gaster Wells-Fargo Service Company Executive Support (602) 790-2081 > -Original Message- > From: Frederic Gos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PR

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IEExec vs. AppDomain.ExecuteAssembly

2002-12-11 Thread Shawn A. Van Ness
>Using Anakrino on ieexec.exe reveals this: Thanks Frederic (but I know how to read the ILDASM output just fine :). What does it all mean? Is this ~1000 lines goo all for the sake of hooking up DLL controls w/in IE? For the EXE case (which is what I'm currently interested in -- sorry I neglect

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] How to resolve class naming collisions between assemblies?

2002-12-11 Thread Craig Andera
> It would be nice if I could do something like: > > X,A1 x1 = new X,A1(); > X,A2 x2 = new X,A2(); > > I've tried and can't find a way to do this, but maybe I'm missing > something. You're not missing anything. The C# and VB.NET compilers are fundamentally broken (in the sense of missing a cruci

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Booth, Bill
Here is a good source of CDO info. http://www.cdolive.com/cdo1.htm I think they are installing Outlook just to make sure CDO is installed. -Original Message- From: Barraud Peter(KSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Iain Smallwood
From: Barraud Peter(KSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I've created this simple app that sends mail using .net's web > mail in vb.net > now if I run it off my machine it runs just fine > but if I run it off the server then it gives an error "Could > not create CDO. > Message object" > The server co

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Help! GC Handles leaking

2002-12-11 Thread Jim Murphy
Can you instrument you COM code to log something in the final release to ensure it really is releasing? Jim Murphy Mindreef, LLC http://www.mindreef.com > -Original Message- > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christ

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Saye, Robert
I had quite a few problems with Web mail, could you put the code you are using to initialize the object. I got this same error and want to see if you are doing what I did. -Original Message- From: Barraud Peter(KSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09,

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Frederic Gos
Hi Peter, Do you have the IIS SMTP service running and configured in the server? If not, try to install that. btw, I know you stated that 'smtp server is another machine' but I think that CDOSYS.DLL comes with the SMTP server. Hope this helps Frederic -O

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] bug in .net remoting/COM+ ?

2002-12-11 Thread Mark Nicholls
here's the code // using System; using System.Runtime.Remoting; using System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels; using System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Tcp; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.EnterpriseServices; namesp

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Writing VS.NET Tools

2002-12-11 Thread Jon Flanders
IIRC IVsSingleFileGenerator is a COM interface (this is the interface that the BaseGeneratorWithSite class exposed that VS.NET uses). Look at the assembly that the Crystal Reports people made that does the same thing. Define the interface (using the correct COM interop attributes), write a class t

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Mail

2002-12-11 Thread Barraud Peter(KSA)
Hi, I've created this simple app that sends mail using .net's web mail in vb.net now if I run it off my machine it runs just fine but if I run it off the server then it gives an error "Could not create CDO. Message object" The server config: dotnet installed smtp server is anot

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IEExec vs. AppDomain.ExecuteAssembly

2002-12-11 Thread Frederic Gos
Using Anakrino on ieexec.exe reveals this: internal static int Main(string[] args) { int local0; string local1; string local2; string local3; int local4; StringBuilder local5; int local6; string local7; Evidence local8;

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] bug in .net remoting/COM+ ?

2002-12-11 Thread Mark Nicholls
or me? 99% sure it's me but I've posted this message on the CLR and CX groups and drawn a blank. I have got a problem with wrapping a .net remoting class library with a ServicedComponent and accessing it from VB6. I have a single assembly, consisting of a single dll, a class, and an interface. St

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IrDA and Sockets

2002-12-11 Thread Gavin Williams (Hexillion)
Hi, Dale > I am looking for sample C# code for accessing the IrDA port using the > Sockets. Using AddressFamily.Irda is documented but enums are used for > SocketType and ProtocolType in declaring a new socket? I am looking to > receive vCard data from a palm. Any suggestions would be appreciated

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] JNBridge

2002-12-11 Thread Damian Mehers
You might want to also take a look at the Ja.NET bridge -- it incorporates a pure Java implementation of the .NET Remoting protocols and can talk both the SOAP and binary protocols over both TCP/IP and HTTP. This means that you don't have to install any special software on the .NET side of things.

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] RegSvcs/RegAsm with dependencies

2002-12-11 Thread xwscom3
I don't think there is any easier way - we have to be very conservative unregistering typelibs, for fear of deleting something important from the machine. Note that for production use, just-in-time registration is not recommended; it is better to register your components up front. I know for exam

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Anyone using RMTrack?

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Glynn
We have just implemented TrackRecord from Numega (Compuware). One of the many reasons was the integration with the rest of Numega's tools. On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:21:25 -0800, Jim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hey all, > >I'm looking for a bug tracking solution. I've been evaluating the RMTr

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Help! GC Handles leaking

2002-12-11 Thread Christopher Brown (NDP)
Mark, I can't promise a specific solution but I have passed this along to the dev team. I'll let you know if something turns up. Cheers, Chris Christopher Brown Program Manager Common Language Runtime -Original Message- From: Mark Vatsaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, Decemb

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IrDA and Sockets

2002-12-11 Thread Stoyan Damov
Hi Dale, Socket sock = new Socket ( AddressFamily.Irda, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Unspecified); IR sockets support only connection-oriented streams -- thus the SocketType.Stream. The protocolType parameter isn't required because the transport catalog has only one ent

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Writing VS.NET Tools

2002-12-11 Thread Shawn Wildermuth
As some of you know, Chris Sells and I developed an improved Typed DataSet generator for use with VS.NET. In the 1.0 version of the tool we inherited the class BaseGeneratorWithSite from Microsoft.VSDesigner.dll. Unfortunately, Microsoft changed this class (and all associated classes/interfaces)

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] IEExec vs. AppDomain.ExecuteAssembly

2002-12-11 Thread Shawn A. Van Ness
What, if anything, does IEExec.exe do differently than this? static void Main( string[] args) { AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ExecuteAssembly(args[0]); } I played around w/ various CAS and IE zone-settings for a few minutes, and got pretty much identical results. Am I missing some