Just realized that code could benefit from some sample usage...
-S
static void CopyLargeFile(string source, string destination, bool wait)
{
int buffersize = 65536; //ymmv
bool useasync=true; //required!
using (Stream src = new FileStream(
source,FileMode.O
I recently had a similar need... maybe this will help you?
http://www.windojitsu.com/code/asyncstreampump.cs.html
In my case, I wanted to tap the two streams together, asynchronously... so
I use async I/O (viz. Stream.BeginRead).
Heed the warning in the comments: although this technique will app
I want to copy one stream to another. In unmanaged world I would use
IStream::CopyTo. In .NET the only way I see is to do pairs of Read/Write.
What happened to CopyTo?
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be int
You're right -- if you need your applications to fully grok the updated schema, then
the applications will need to change. My point was that it's quite possible to make
many kinds of significant schema changes that end up having no impact at all on
applications, provided that the applications a
Hello,
I'm working on an application that uses an AxWebBrowser control. I've had a
couple of problems. I dynamically create the HTML that I load into some of
the pages and others are static pages. Sometimes when I click on a link
that should take be to a dynamic page I get a "Page cannot be found"
We have a trivial shim class which wraps an implementation of
IXPathNavigable. When we pass this to an XSL identity transform some of
the elements atributes are lost. It doesn't matter whether we wrap our own
custom XPathNavigator implementation or XmlDocument's.
Anyone else had problems passing c
Invoke, as in through a delegate. I tried invoking a method synchronously
on the STA thread through a delegate and it didn't seem to work. Should it
have worked?
Anyway I used Thread/ThreadStart to run it and it seems to work but I would
be happier if I could make the delegate work. Someone is tel
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:29 PM
>
> A considerate DBA would not do that. She will either make Name
> a computed column, or rename the underlying table and make a
> view Candidate that has a Name column -- even if it also has
> FirstName a
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:42 PM
>
> > I prefer SELECT *, because I think the risks in that scenario
> > is low, and made lower by proper application of other
> > practices.
>
> Feel free to code however you want ;) We try to adhere to th
