Serge,
thanks for this proposal, I'll try it.
- Original Message -
From: "Serge Lidin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Metadata question
Unfortunately, there is no API in IMetaDataImport, returning the type o
Unfortunately, there is no API in IMetaDataImport, returning the type of the metadata
stream. Also, there is no API that would retrieve the RIDs of the *Ptr tables. All
handling of additional indirection in the unoptimized metadata is done behind the
scenes, and there is no distinction between o
On 06/21/04 Serge Lidin wrote:
> Yes, you can produce the assembly files with unoptimized metadata. Some
> folks even ship them. It's considered sloppy because of additional
> overhead (and because it's an indication that the assembly wasn't
> completely recompiled before shipping),
In less politi
Serge,
thank you for your clarification. It seems that I have to modify my loader
and add support for unoptimized metadata representation.
I would like, however, to use an efficient mapping where possible,
especially since unoptimized assemblies seem to be rare.
Hence I have a further question - i
