- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Scheidegger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET vs Windows SP versioning?
: > The .NET Framework is on the ISO image you can download from MSDN
Subscriber downloads (the 400MB one),
: > and a colleague here said that you get an o
Right, the opt/unopt IL is only trivially different. It's curious why the
C# compiler bothers with it at all (or rather, why it doesn't always do the
trivial opt).
To be sure, the JITter does the vast majority of the optimization. And it's
pretty good, as various benchmarks of managed-code throu
> Who comprises your target installation base?
I do a lot of research & dev for Tablet PC. The improvements to the Tablet
PC experience w/ SP2 are *huge*, definitely not the kind of thing you expect
of a SP, more like a major rev (or two or three).
It would not be out of the question to require
Who comprises your target installation base?
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Ness
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August 2004 10:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET vs Windows SP version
Wow, thanks for the responses everyone. (Especially Jekke, for the line
about decaf.. rotfl!)
I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who's a bit confused...
I can add a little info to this thread, myself: I installed SP2 from the
ISO cd image, but I already had the v1.0sp2 and v1.1 CLRs on all m
Relxation is definitely in order..
No updates with XP SP2, if there was I'm sure you would have heard about
it by now.
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince Pacella
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August 2004 0:26
To: [EMAI
How good is the (x86) JITter at producing optimal code from IL? I was
looking at some IL generated by the C# compiler, and it struck me as fairly
even when optimization was turned on. Of course, this doesn't matter if the
JITter can optimize away the superfluous local variables, loads and stores.
At 02:08 PM 8/23/2004, Thomas Scheidegger wrote
> > The .NET Framework is on the ISO image you can download from MSDN Subscriber
> downloads (the 400MB one),
> > and a colleague here said that you get an option as part of the auto-run to
> install .NET Framework.
>
>
>The .NET Framework 1.1 S
> The .NET Framework is on the ISO image you can download from MSDN Subscriber
downloads (the 400MB one),
> and a colleague here said that you get an option as part of the auto-run to
install .NET Framework.
The .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 is included on the RTM XPSP2 ISO image from MSDN.
(b
I'm seeing this WebException pop up randomly when connecting to an ASP.NET
1.1 Web Service using integrated authentication:
System.Net.WebException: The underlying connection was closed: An
unexpected error occurred on a send.
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.WebClientProtocol.GetWebResponse
(WebR
Thomas--
I say this with the utmost respect for your talent and position...
Decaf can taste just as good as regular coffee these days.
When troubleshooting a question like this, analysis towards "does not"
is always preferrable to "would not."
--Jekke
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderat
Oh relax already.
Regards,
J. Vince Pacella / OOCL Chicago
Cell 773-454-8683 Fax - 773-867-5050
Cargo Tracking Online at:
www.cargosmart.com and www.oocl.com
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Tomiczek
> So, unless the SQL Server installer is working incorrectly
> (improbable, but not inconceivable,) XPSP2 didn't install the
> 2.0 framework.
Given that even your SQL Server 2005 BETA does
NOT NOT NOT install the .NET 2.0 framework, just a beta,
It is pretty clear that XPSP2 will NOT install
As luck would have it, I just installed a fresh machine with Windows XP,
did all the auto-updates, then added the network/many computers version
of XPSP2. Immediately thereaftere, I did a full install of the SQL
Server 2005 Beta and got to watch it do a fresh install of the .net 2.0
runtime.
So, u
Shawn A. Van Ness wrote:
> Two simple questions for which I should know the answer, but don't:
>
> Does XP SP2 include the .NET framework? If so, what
> version(s)? Does it include any bits from the upcoming
> .NET service packs [1]?
I can't give any authoritive answers, but I have the followi
My understanding is that .NET Framework is not included in SP2
There is no mention of it at all here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/sp2chngs.mspx
Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2
Additionally, there is no mention on the link you post
16 matches
Mail list logo
