I am a bit surprised no one has mentionned Fortran yet ... For a math library,
I would say it is a choice more than appropriate. There is a Fortran.NET
compiler, thought I don't know how it compares to C# or C++ in terms of
performance. Of course, you can't expect it to beat the Intel "optimized
I wasn't talking about the value-added algorithms. I was talking about
the underlying features introduced by the language that may,
inadvertently, affect performance.
For, example, there is no string type in C, so pointers to character (or
character arrays) are used. In C++ with MFC you have the
Ben,
I used to work on C++ before i moved to .NET too. I am very impressed
with the abilities of the framework and the ease with which you can
write the same code in a shorter time. But, then again, IMO any
framework cannot be generically used for all purposes and situations.
Since my situation de
All the comments I've seen so far comparing C/C++ and .NET (specifically
C#) have been *very* subjective.
Lack of pointers in a language does not guarantee an improvement in
quality. C# may remove dealings with pointers in the general case; but,
that does not mean programmers working in "pointer-
Also, the bug rate when not using pointers drops dramatically.
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Kloosterman
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:11 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-
Outlook is (in)famous for adding and / or eating line breaks... It
happened to me many times. If you are using Outlook and it's the first
time you see this, you've been lucky until now.
On 7/6/05, Steve Welborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply,
>
> Yea it answers my question. A
