Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Help with Web Server

2005-08-30 Thread Erick Thompson
IIS is very safe, and light. IIS7 will have a memory footprint of less then 1meg, but that's a ways off still. If they are totally paranoid, you can use WSE3 to host web services without using IIS (either HTTP or TCP or custom). HTH Erick > -Original Message- > From: Unmoderated discussi

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reasons to use HTTP remoting

2005-08-30 Thread Ian Griffiths
>"Whidbey" >When is this scheduled out? 7th November. -- Ian Griffiths === This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Help with Web Server

2005-08-30 Thread Franklin Gray
Currently we have a custom protocol written in VB 6.0 to handle Intranet (that goes through firewall) app calls (read and write data to DB). I've been asked to see if there is a DotNet way (not a custom protocol) to have a web page go through a firewall for an intranet app.ARE YOU READY FOR TH

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in Reflection...

2005-08-30 Thread Shawn Wildermuth
Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics., Doesn't work for me. It takes me to the object browser instead. Very frustating. Maybe I need symbols added (though that seems kinda contrary to the "reflector" ideal. Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth http://adoguy.com C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Spea

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reasons to use HTTP remoting

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Richardson
You mention that IIS hosting is rather "slow" - it depends. How are you loading the config file? Are you using the server garbage collector or the client garbage collector? The TCP channel can only use the client garbage collector, whereas the HTTP channel can make use of the server garbage coll

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in Reflection...

2005-08-30 Thread Paul Mehner
Hi Shawn, I didn't actually do anything to get it turned on. It just worked that way for me. When I right click on a framework class library object and select the "Go To Definition" from the context menu. I see reflection generated code on my beta 2 installation. --Paul -Original Message

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in Reflection...

2005-08-30 Thread Shawn Wildermuth
Um...could you hint at how to get this to show? It doesn't seem to show it automatically, and if I unselect "Only my Code", ot shows disassembly, not reflected code. Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth http://adoguy.com C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker ->-Original Message- ->From: Unmoderated

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in Reflection...

2005-08-30 Thread Adam Sills
I don't know about actual source code, but right clicking an item and selecting Go To Definition will bring up a file showing the definition of the class. It works in Beta2 anyway. Adam.. > -Original Message- > From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in Reflection...

2005-08-30 Thread Paul Mehner
Yes, this works very well in Beta 2. --Paul -Original Message- From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Wildermuth Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:33 AM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in R

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Built-in Reflection...

2005-08-30 Thread Shawn Wildermuth
In early builds of Visual Studio 2005, I saw the ability to view the source code (via reflection) of framework elements to help debug code. Has anyone seen this work in Beta 2 (sorry if this is the wrong list, it was the closest I could figure out). Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth http://adoguy.com C#

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] AssemblyBinding commands being ignored

2005-08-30 Thread J. Merrill
No one seems to have responded to this. Is the problem that your "I have a requirement to redirect the binding of several assemblies to new >versions without rebuilding my application. [snip] > >[snip] > [snip] >=== Pre-bind state information === >LOG: DisplayName = Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reasons to use HTTP remoting

2005-08-30 Thread Franklin Gray
"Whidbey" When is this scheduled out? === This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reasons to use HTTP remoting

2005-08-30 Thread Davy J
System.Net.GlobalProxySelection.Select = new System.Net.WebProxy(proxyURI,true,null,System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials); Not had a instance where the line above doesn't solve the proxy problems, but then I've only tried it against a couple of hardwired proxys, Ms. Proxy , and one linux

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reasons to use HTTP remoting

2005-08-30 Thread Davies, Glenn
You can use integrated Windows authentication if your remoted component is hosted in IIS and it works well, though it can be rather slow so avoid making lots of fine-grained calls to your remoted component. I was under the impression that it will work through a firewall (with port 80 open, obviousl

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reasons to use HTTP remoting

2005-08-30 Thread Davy J
Binary across a firewall works, I have a custom asp.net app that streams the MDB database when you call it , and another that streams back the new mdb when changes have been made. (it was the only way I could do it due to providers stupid rules, before you all crucify me :P ) it's the http tran