The callbacks are on completion port threads.
You can verify this by checking the number of available/total Threadpool and
IOCP threads from such a callback.
On 2/16/06, Tony Hal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Which thread calls the callback passed to Socket.BeginReceive/BeginSend.
>
i´m sorry but i changed the code to avoid the error, it´s not happening any
more, i can´t do more tests ...
This is a project that i have to deliver :)
-Mensagem original-
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Simeon Pilgrim
Enviada em: quinta-feira,
No, its not a winforms ... And theres no other threads changing the value ..
-Mensagem original-
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Aranki, Tim
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2006 19:52
Para: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Assun
>public static T CreateObjectFromString(string typeName, Type[]
> types, string[] paramValues)
Why not the more generic object[] for paramValues?
> parameters[i] = Convert.ChangeType(paramValues[i],
You could use something like the ChangeType helper from
WilsonORMapper's QueryHelper to
Hi all,
Which thread calls the callback passed to Socket.BeginReceive/BeginSend.
Is it the worker thread pool or completion port thread ?
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://disc
Just a thought, but is this a WinForms app? Is it possible that there is
another thread that is updating that value?
/tim
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Russ Alan
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:07 PM
To: ADVANCED
If it's not a pdb out of sync issue, it's probably a side-effect. I've seen
"crazy" stuff when I had unexpected side effects. For instance, what is in
your watch window? Sometimes a property displayed in the watch window has
side-effects that change what is happening in the normal flow of control
So what happens if you change the flow of your code to look more like
this (as Peter Suter suggested). I'm not a VB'er so syntax could be
wrong.
Dim sDir As String = ""
Dim val As Integer = FaixasInferior.Count
If val = 0 then
FaixasCarrega(.)
<...>
Then put a break point on the FaixasCar
Hi,
Yes i know, i not a novice, and spent hours on this problem, check the
screenshot ...
-Mensagem original-
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Steve Welborn
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2006 11:33
Para: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.
Yes,sure,
I restarted the Vstudio, deleted the .pdb ... And so on ... i´m certified in
.Net development, and have 15 years experience in programming ... i´m not a
novice ...
Bye
Vitor
-Mensagem original-
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Steve
Mayba cause i´m in Brazil, Greenwich time -3
-Mensagem original-
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Ryan Heath
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2006 11:22
Para: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Assunto: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET I
I´m sorry guys,
I only check this list from time to time ...
Here´s the link to the screenshot...
http://201.17.129.58/publico/code.jpg
The tooltip shows the value of Count, but the yellow line shows that the
code did what it should´nt ...
Vitor
-Mensagem original-
De: Discussion of
Guys,
I need some help with the osql.exe sql server 2000 command line utility.
For the most part everything works fine except...
I have really large SQL files to execute. These files are automatically
generated and FTP'd to a directory. There is a Windows Service that runs on
that machine and
> I may not have been clear; but, I'm not saying all
> strong-named assemblies
> are "granted" FullTrust I'm saying (when they don't refuse it
> or use APTC)
> the implicit LinkDemand for FullTrust means their code can't
> run without
> it.
The implicit demand on a strongly named assembly (A, for
I think we're getting stuck on semantics and side-tracked on explicit
FullTrust assignment.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:03:41 -0700, Mike Woodring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Huh? Have you tried that? A fully trusted exe, for example, running off
>the hard drive and with full trust, can indeed load s
I wrote a class that is basically a wrapper for creating dynamic objects
based on their assembly and type name (as string). I use:
Type.GetType(TypeNameAndAssemblyString).GetContructor(ParamTypes[]).Invo
ke(ParamValueObjects[]);
I have that wrapped in a generic method that:
return T returnObj
I have absolutely no idea if this will help but this is a article about
examining the PE
http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/dotnetformat.asp
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Hill
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 11
The CopyPixelOperation values don't work if the destination is a graphics
object backed by an in memory bitmap. However, it does work if the Graphics
object is from a Control (ie backed with video memory). Is there a way in
.Net to allocate a Bitmap which is allocated from video memory?
===
> >"By default, strongly named, **fully trusted** assemblies
> are given an
> >implicit LinkDemand for FullTrust on every public and
> protected method of
> >every publicly visible class."
>
> You can't explicitly grant full-trust to an assembly, you can
> grant full-
> trust to a zone where an ass
Does anybody know how to determine an executable's preferred base address
(image base) from managed code? I know how to use dumpbin /headers to get this
information (image base) but I was hoping there was perhaps a more direct
route. System.Diagnostics.ProcessModule.BaseAddress gives you the b
> That's not what I've observed. I tried just that, running an
> strong-named
> assembly locally and from the Internet. Adding FullTrust for
> the assembly
> by publickey and name (no version) still caused it to be
> denied when run
> from the Internet.
Sounds to me like you've got a configurati
> Thanks for responding, but I need to soft code the form names because I do
> not know what are called at design time.
>
When I read your question, AppDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap did cross
my mind, but I skipped it as soon as I read you had done similar stuff
in VB6 several years ago... ;)
Ca
22 matches
Mail list logo
