We're on the same page, at the Foo level.
Thanks,
Shawn Wildermuth
http://adoguy.com
C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Cleaver
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 1:45 AM
To: ADVANCE
Shawn,
When you say "keep static data about the schema at the type level" did
you mean at the Foo<> level, or the Foo level? The CLR
currently keeps it at the Foo which is what I want, and
I think what you mean.
I'm looking at cutting 1000's of lines of code from my projects, because
I have lots
This question got me thinking a lot about overhead and statics. I have to
say I think I like this implementation (where Foo and Foo are
two different types). If I were to write a wrapper that did
Foo and keep static data about the schema at the type level,
it might cause a lot of static data, but
Jon,
The PeekMessaage declaration is correct, but I would remove the Alias
"PeekMessageA" clause and instead add the Auto modifier keyword.
All your other declarations are incorrect, they look like they are written
for VB6 rather than VB.NET. I suggest you try to find correct ones at
www.pinvoke
Is anyone familiar with PeekMessage? I am trying to get a sample app to run
and I cannot. The sample app did not provide the code for the PeekMessage
API.
Below are two samples. The first is a sample that seems pretty simple, but
they did not provide a declaration for PeekMessage. The 2nd sampl
Peter,
Actually, now that you mention it I will see what I want. Basically, in
almost every class I have I have 2 static datasets containing a list of
all of the items in the database for that class - especially the likes
of a "Country" table where countries are not added regularly if ever, I
keep
Statics in generics don't operate any differently than non-generic
classes. They're basically globals that are scoped within a class.
Generics are also not like unmanaged C++ templates; their body is not
copied (inlined) for each use.
In your example, x is a member of GenericBase. If you change
I just tried a test like this:
class GenericBase
{
public static int x;
}
class GenericClass1 : GenericBase
{
}
class GenericClass2 : GenericBase
{
}
And then ran this:
GenericClass1.x = 5;
GenericClass2.x = 10;
MessageBox.Show(GenericClass1.x.ToString());
To my disappointment, it display
eric,
perforce supports cross-domain (their perforce to your perforce) integration.
it will allow you to have the third parties work in their own p4 domain
(perfoce server) in a branch split from yours. you can manage the process of
integrating their branch with the main one based on whatever m
