Are you doing any automatic FxCop analysis as well?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:00:10 -0500, Luca Minudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>For my own curiosity, how will you be using these metrics? Will you be
>>using them to monitor evolution of code (e.g. this week MethodA has
>>increased in Cyclomatic
On 3/2/06, Franklin Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How do I find this current user profile location for a windows service?
> I've been searching all over and can't find anything.
>
More specifically, use the Environment.SpecialFolder.ApplicationData or
.PersonalFolders, as appropriate. Most
On 3/2/06, Franklin Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How do I find this current user profile location for a windows service?
> I've been searching all over and can't find anything.
>
Call the Environment.SpecialFolder property and use the value as part of
your filename.
--
Steve Johnson
=
Thanksthat did it.
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
>For my own curiosity, how will you be using these metrics? Will you be
>using them to monitor evolution of code (e.g. this week MethodA has
>increased in Cyclomatic Complexity by 5 or 10%)? Or would you be looking
>to have the automated tool flag items based on configurable thresholds?
>(e.g. on
Environment.GetFolderPath will help here.
cheers,
dominick
-
Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor
http://www.leastprivilege.com
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Franklin Gray
Sent: Donnerstag, 2.
How do I find this current user profile location for a windows service?
I've been searching all over and can't find anything.
>Unfortunately, you won't even be able to write there. Services always load
>a profile, so you can use a CurrentUser profile location to write your
file.
>
>--
>Steve Joh
Sorry, I should have been more clear. With C# calling C# there isn't an
issue because there's no way in C# to generate user filters.
That's not to say that for any publicly available C# method there won't be
current user filter that will get a crack at running code before running
the C# finally b
thanks! :)
that what I meant with "and a lot more..."
cheers,
dominick
-
Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor
http://www.leastprivilege.com
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian - IT
Department
Watch the default settings (from Dominick's blog):
http://www.leastprivilege.com/BewareBeAwareOfClickOnceDefaultSettings.aspx
On Thu, March 2, 2006 7:51 am, Simon Lovely said:
> Dominic,
>
> I've looked at ClickOnce again. I'm impressed, so i'm updating all the
> apps and scrapping our own system
Dominic,
I've looked at ClickOnce again. I'm impressed, so i'm updating all the apps
and scrapping our own system!!
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Lovely
Sent: 02 March 2006 13:40
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUS
You say that "C# does not have filters (aka user filters) so this isn't an
issue in C#" -- does this mean that you cannot be subject to such an attack
in C#, or just that you can't implement one? i.e. is a C# method being
potentially called by either a VB or C++ method similarly vulnerable?
On 3/2
I haven't found a comprehensive metrics tool for .NET. There are tools
out there that provide metrics based upon MSIL; but they, of course,
ignore comments and provide skewed metrics that normally include comments
(like Maintainability Index).
The ones I've had time to looked:
CodeMetrics reflect
Rethrowing shouldn't be as rare as you might think, at least with managed
C++ and VB.NET, if you look at some of the security information on
exceptions (http://tinyurl.com/h56tn [1]), which shows how code calling
other code could actually manage to run with extended permissions.
With filtered exce
Yeah, thanks Dominick, I have had a quick look at that, but was hoping to avoid
having to change all of our apps. Plus our existing solution works with .net
1.1 as well.
I will take a further look at it though to see if it's worth changing to.
Thanks,
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: D
Hi,
maybe you want to have a look at ClickOnce - the new deployment strategy in
2.0 - which does exactly what you want - and a lot more...
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/05/ClickOnce/
cheers,
dominick
-
Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor
http://www.leastp
Hello all,
I have a system to automatically update applications when they are run by
the user. The idea came from a training course with DevelopMentor (Andrew
Gayter).
Basically, all the users machines have a shim application which just does
this:
private static void Main(string[] arg)
{
if ((
Hi all, I'm selecting a tool to collect OO metrics.
The tool I'm looking for hopefully:
- is integrated in VS.NET IDE and easy to use
- have a command line version (to call it in the automatic night buid) and
produce flexible (i.e. XML+XSLT->HTML) reports
- compute/collect the most used OO metrics
Yes.
throw (ex); resets the stack trace whereas throw; retains the stack trace.
Cheers
Jon
In the rare case were you catch and rethrow an exception, is there any
difference between throwing the same exception, and using an empty throw?
try {
// some code
} catch(SomeException ex) {
// some c
Nope. The empty throw rethrows the exception without resetting stack trace
information (the exception is propagated as if the catch block wasn't
there). The "throw (ex)" line is a new throw that means the stack trace
information points to this throw, not the previous, caught, throw.
The empty throw statement rethrows the exception handled by the catch. So it's
exactly the same thing.
Walid Soumer.
Message d'origine
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. de la part de Ragnvald Barth
Date: jeu. 02/03/2006 09:16
À: ADVANCED-D
In the rare case were you catch and rethrow an exception, is there any
difference between throwing the same exception, and using an empty throw?
try {
// some code
} catch(SomeException ex) {
// some code
throw(ex); // rethrow like this?
throw; // or rethrow like this?
}
=
22 matches
Mail list logo
