Matthew,
> SetSecurityInfo seems to need an IntPtr
You can change the handle parameter type to a SafeWaitHandle instead.
Mattias
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.
Indeed, that is the answer JM!
I was thinking to use the Journal Queue as a repository for all sent
messages. However, the message is copied to the journal only when it is
consumed from the queue. In other words, undelivered messages will never get
to go to the Journal Queue, so even if a negative
All,
I have the below code, previously in VB.NET 1.0/2002. It is (as far as I
understand) creating a mutex and then removing ACL/security information.
I get a warning in VB.NET 2.0/2005 stating I should use SafeWaitHandle
rather than Handle.
I have read a few blogs about the benefits of Safe
If you created a Message object, isn't the Id property available after Send
returns? (If you pass anything other than a Message as the object to be sent,
you won't be able to get the Id.)
I have not tried this, but nothing else makes much sense.
At 02:57 PM 3/23/2006, Eddie Lascu wrote
>Hello
Hello everybody,
I am trying to grasp the acknowledgment mechanism of Messaging namespace. I
saw a bunch of examples where you can set what type of acknowledgment you
want (for example positive receive and arrival where you are notified when
your message reaches the destination queue and when is c
Greg,
You can do that in two ways:
1. Have a configuration file for each library project and load in your main
application a particular library, based on the user's role. You can store
the connection strings in the lib's config file, respectively. However, be
aware that you will only be able to i
Eric,
Yes, sorry .Net 2.0. The centralized config might do the trick.
Eddie,
"Leaving aside the discussion whether this is a good idea or
not, this is where I lost you. Do you want to have capabilities to
connect to different db instances from the same app? Or do you want to
c
That capability exists in .NET 1.1 too. I used it. The difference is, I
believe, that in 1.1 you can only have 2 levels of inclusion, whereas in 2.0
there is no such restriction. Anyone care to comment on this?
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hi Greg,
I am not sure I understand what is your environment. I suppose you have
several projects in your solution, some that generate libraries and other
that generate application. I think you should have a separate "app.config"
file for each application and store the connection string there. Lea
You didn't say which version you're using, but in .Net 2.0 there's a way to
include settings from another .config file (which could be a single,
centralized config file), which would allow you to change a single setting
in a single file and have it be picked up by any number of apps.
Check out the
We are developing several in-house applications, basically one master
"shell" application with several libraries. We operate on multiple MS
SQL Servers: Dev, QA, Training, and Production. Each project has a
Settings entry for a connection to the development server. Our goal is
to have a way to modi
11 matches
Mail list logo
