Never mind, I got it, I add that file thru the File System view into the
application folder and then I can set exclude to true there.
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Smotritsky
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 7:46 PM
To: A
Hey Phil,
On page 85 you say: ". you set Exclude to be true in the properties for the
file." This is for a vbscript file that has the code for a custom action
that I've added thru visual studio 2003 standard. I don't see the hook to
set Exclude=true. Is vs.net 2003 standard missing the feature?
Thanks! I really didn't want to have to compile in debug, so NoInlining does
the trick.
Mark Hurd wrote:
The JIT compiler is inlining them.
If you compile with -debug+ or add
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
and
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]
prior to the methods
The JIT compiler is inlining them.
If you compile with -debug+ or add
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
and
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]
prior to the methods you need in the stack, you can guarantee it to be so.
Regards,
Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.)
===
Hello,
I have been testing some code (v1.1) dealing with the StackTrace and StackFrame
classes. I have found some interesting things about
the StackFrames that I can't explain [with documentation] when deriving classes
and getting the StackFrame information from that.
If I have the following c
I will be out of the office starting 05/12/2006 and will not return until
06/05/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.d
