Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Opinion on a tree implementation

2007-07-28 Thread Sébastien Lorion
I actually like the PowerCollections a lot and do not reject it at all. I don't know where you got that impression ?! The only change I would do is split up the Algorithms class. It takes already a long time to find the method you need and on some slower machines, it slows down VS to a crawl when I

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Opinion on a tree implementation

2007-07-28 Thread Marc Brooks
> My business need is building an open source collection component. I will > use it for in my own software once it is stabilized. Sounds interesting... any reason not to just use PowerCollections? I understand wanting to build your own to learn... but do you have a reason to reject a very good li

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IWin32Window without Windows.Forms

2007-07-28 Thread Christopher Frazier
On 7/28/07, Brady Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a little utility to show the ADO Data Link Properties dialogue for > editing connection strings. I've just moved all the code out of the > original WinForms test project into a class library, as my code has nothing > to do with any .NET U

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] IWin32Window without Windows.Forms

2007-07-28 Thread Brady Kelly
I have a little utility to show the ADO Data Link Properties dialogue for editing connection strings. I've just moved all the code out of the original WinForms test project into a class library, as my code has nothing to do with any .NET UI, but I've come short with the owner parameter I need to p