Test the candidate at the abstraction-level that his work will be done
on. Actually this thread nicely points out what limited knowledge some
interviewers have of the .net Framework!
Ask yourelf: when you interview someone for a C job, would you ask him
questions related to assembly instructions,
Thank You ! Thank You ! Thank You ! :)
http://iheartdotnet.blogspot.com/2007/10/net-framework-library-source-code.html
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
> Given a custom type, how can you define what value gets passed when it is
> used as a database parameter? Consider:
>
> public class MyClass {
> public string Value;
> public MyClass(string value) { this.Value = value; }
> }
>
> using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand()) {
> // I want myClas
Is the COM DLL marked as free-threaded? Or Single-thread apartment (STA)?
Make sure you use SetApartmentState (2.0) or the ApartmentState property
(1.1) on your threads to match the threading model of the COM component.
---
Patrick Steele
http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele
-Original Message---
Just catching up on this topic... I would also ask some questions about
functional style of programming. My (limited) experience tells me that
people that grasps this are often (but not always) much better
programmers/architects. This becomes even more important in light of LINQ et
al.
Also, some
Given a custom type, how can you define what value gets passed when it is
used as a database parameter? Consider:
public class MyClass {
public string Value;
public MyClass(string value) { this.Value = value; }
}
using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand()) {
// I want myClass to be a string w
I have a third-party COM dll that appears to be not thread safe. The dll
itself is used to process a binary file.
I have two .NET threads running in parallel. Each creates it's own
isntance of the same object from that COM dll used to process the files.
Threads never try to process the same binary
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:29:25 +0200, Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:31:04 +0200, Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:28:58 +0200, Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >Often no experience and likely not really that mu
