On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 11:44:48 -0700,
David Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:33:58 -0600, Brad Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In your previous message, you mentioned you were using unmanaged C++. How,
>then, are you "boxing" anything in
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 20:19:30 +1000, Nick Wienholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am seeing something very different from your results.
>
>1. An initial capacity is much better for performance. (x3 better for no
>boxing)
That is odd. It is most definitely a wash on my system (even a few ms
slower
>This is particularly true when JIT compilation is
>involved.
Good point about the JIT. I hadn't considered that. You mentioned JIT
here. I was comparing unmanaged C++ to managed C#. That is, no /clr on
the C++ code. You weren't using /clr in your test, right?
>knew - benchmarks don't neces
You can also organize these 'linked' files into a folder. I have been
using a folder 'libsrc'. It is a little weird because the IDE will create a
physical folder, but it doesn't actually contain any files.
David
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Woodring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
