Said tool is ILMerge -- http://research.microsoft.com/~mbarnett/ILMerge.aspx
There's also a custom MSBuild script available to integrate into VS.NET --
http://blogs.msdn.com/jomo_fisher/archive/2006/03/05/544144.aspx
Mark
http://www.julmar.com/blog/mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Disc
> Does anyone actually do this in any situations? csc
> /t:module is interesting, but I can't find a use where I
> could recommend it to a customer for their production
> systems. Anyone?
I've used this in one project where we had a piece of managed C++ code
(which had to be C++ for various reas
ECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:46 PM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Retrieving all available data
> on a Blocking TCP Listener Call...
>
> > Is that true for a client as well? I thought the client had to k
> Is that true for a client as well? I thought the client had
> to keep the connection open in order to receive the server's
> response. I know the
> *server* can omit Content-Length and close the connection;
> but it seems that would be not-very-useful for a client to do.
All header entity values
to read until the socket is closed by the
peer side.
Mark Smith
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
bly, but you
can give it a shot. If you are willing to add a new target type into
MSBuild, Jomo Fisher had a process for using ILMerge from within VS.NET --
http://blogs.msdn.com/jomo_fisher/default.aspx
Best Regards,
Mark Smith
===
This list is hosted by Develop
> It seems to me that CoR adds little value to the original question if I
can remember it correctly ;-) The fact that
> it's a chain is not important because it's unlikely that the list of known
processors for the various flavors of the
> document are unknown. Second, this discussion of the CoR cam
ments of your problem before choosing the way to build
it and that there are probably many appropriate ways you can go about it..
Best Regards,
Mark Smith
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
object a chance to process a
request. If you are mapping to only a single processing object then it
might be overkill.
Best Regards,
Mark Smith
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
ctory is generally a better option as it removes the
coupling between all the strategies themselves.
Best Regards,
Mark Smith
DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
Have you tried AddRange instead of Add? It seems to be faster from what
I've done in the past.
Best Regards,
Mark Smith
DevelopMentor
http://www.develop.com
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamin Guy
,
Mark Smith
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Garry Barclay
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Missing callbacks from
&
12 matches
Mail list logo
