iscussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yogesh Shetty
Sent: Thursday, 4 July 2002 10:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Benchmarking
Thx for the response...
Arraylist with 20 lakhs record but this time with class reference
VC++ - 93 ms
Si
Yogesh Shetty wrote:
> Can this be optimized further :-)
Type-safe collections from CollectionGen should (I think) eliminate the last
bottleneck (which isn't benchmarked here), which is casting from Object to
real type when retrieving elements.
Brad
--
Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/
f Fritz Onion
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:55 PM
To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Benchmarking
> Can this be optimized further ?? I know this is the price we have to
> pay for using managed code, once container is fully populated we
>
> Can this be optimized further ?? I know this is the price we have to
> pay for using managed code, once container is fully populated we
> performed a search,traversing,hot spot insertion etc... the difference
> between .NET & VC++ was negligible but SGL was at its best.
> unfortunately SGL is s
However I would still expect considerably worse performance from the CLR
solution because it will be boxing everything that goes in there.
So for this benchmark, what are you trying to measure? Do you only care
about the performance of a container of ints, or are you trying to infer
something mo
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2002 12:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Benchmarking
HI,
We have performed a benchmark for the following collection
1.VC++ List collection
2.Silicon Graphic List collection ( VC++ )
3..NET ArrayList collection
We populated about 50 lakh record
HI,
We have performed a benchmark for the following collection
1.VC++ List collection
2.Silicon Graphic List collection ( VC++ )
3..NET ArrayList collection
We populated about 50 lakh records and below are our observation
1.VC++280 ms
2.SGL
