Works a treat.
Great stuff to all!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:32:00 +
T
Thanks Peter I'll let you know how I get on.
That is a great help!!
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Dat
>>From: Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
>>
>>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>>Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
>>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:33:14 -0500
>>
>>Paul,
>>
I am currently using Visual Studio 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:33:14 -0500
Paul
>
>foreach (Match m in mcl)
>{
>foreach (Group g in m.Groups)
>{
>Console.WriteLine(g.Value);
>}
>}
>}
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Patrick Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
foreach (Group g in m.Groups)
{
Console.WriteLine(g.Value);
}
}
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Patrick Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
S
g, photography)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ritchie
>Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:15 AM
>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
>
>You want t
-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:17 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
That does look interesting Kohli.
One more problem is that some of the requests
10:15 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
You want to ensure a page has a link to a particular jpg file? i.e. has
? That sounds like a time-of-publishing action;
why
would you want to check that for each request?
If you think at request time is st
to know that the image in question is contained in the HTML
>document that is in the request the application will make.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>>From: Steve Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
>>
On 3/8/06, Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not trying to circumvent any adblocker.
>
OK, bad guess then :)
--
Steve Johnson
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://di
I am not trying to circumvent any adblocker.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Steve Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:29:39 -0700
opics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:29:09 -0700
On 3/8/06, Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> You want to ensure a page has a link to a particular jpg file? i.e. has
> ? That sounds like a
On 3/8/06, Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> You want to ensure a page has a link to a particular jpg file? i.e. has
> ? That sounds like a time-of-publishing action; why
> would you want to check that for each request?
My guess is that he's trying to circumvent tools such as Firefo
On 3/8/06, Steve Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My guess is that he's trying to circumvent tools such as Firefox's AdBlock
> extension.
>
>
Not circumvent, just defeat.
--
Steve Johnson
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Vie
ced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:13 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
That is an option but is parsing the IIS log not a non-trivial affair??
I just wish I could do this on the cl
hie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
>>
>>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>>Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
>>Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:49:08 -0500
>>
>>I assume you mean resources linked to v
quot;
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:54:09 -0500
You can look at using a HTML parser. There are few available out there.
One that I have been using for some time is
http://www.netomatix.com/Products/DocumentManage
TED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:12:20 -0500
What about having some automated process run IE and request the pages
you want to test. Then parse through y
Of Paul Cowan
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:37 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Hi all,
Can anyone help me with the following requirements? We want to parse an
HTTP request for a web page and display all the constituent parts that
make
up the web
http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:58 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Thanks Peter,
It is a lon
]
From: Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:49:08 -0500
I assume you mean resources linked to via the likes of . Those "li
dvanced .NET topics."
> >
> >To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> >Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
> >Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:45:23 +0100
> >
> >Hi,
> >if want your application to handle requests for all ressources such as
> &
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:45:23 +0100
Hi,
if want your application to handle requests for all ressources such as
scripts, stylesheets or
I assume you mean resources linked to via the likes of . Those "links" are retrieved as separate HTTP
requests; and whenever the browser feels like it. There's no guarantee
they'll be requested adjacent to the original page's request either.
If you want to find out what dependant files page1.asp
3/8/2006 3:36 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Cc:
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] HTTP help
How about getting a .NET wrapper for HTMLTidy[1], then using whatever
XML API you're most comfortable with (XmlReader/XmlDocument), and
extracting the external URIs?
[1] http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
On 3/8/06, Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone help me with the followi
Hi all,
Can anyone help me with the following requirements? We want to parse an
HTTP request for a web page and display all the constituent parts that make
up the web page. That is I want to display all the additional requests that
are made to make up the whole page (i.e. css, images and javascr
28 matches
Mail list logo
