Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit or Fusion Bug

2003-02-11 Thread Ed Stegman
Thanks Charlie. I'll try the separate thread solution per your advice. Keep Smilin' Ed Stegman -Original Message- From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charlie Poole Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit or Fusion Bug

2003-02-11 Thread Charlie Poole
.com www.charliepoole.org > -Original Message- > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Stegman > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit or Fusion Bug

2003-02-11 Thread Ed Stegman
I'm not using multiple threads. I'm simply assigning a GenericPrincipal to Thread.CurrentPrincipal. The GenericPrincipal encapsulates my custom IIdentity implementation. Note: If I use a GenericIdentity instead of my IIdentity impl, everything works as expected. No doubt this is because Generic

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit or Fusion Bug

2003-02-11 Thread Christopher
.NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Stegman Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit or Fusion Bug I'm not sure if this is pilot error on my part, or a bug in the runtime, or in NUnit 2.0. (Using framework v. 1

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] IIdentity or NUnit or Fusion Bug

2003-02-11 Thread Ed Stegman
I'm not sure if this is pilot error on my part, or a bug in the runtime, or in NUnit 2.0. (Using framework v. 1.0.3705 latest sp.) I've created my own implementation of the IIdentity interface, and used that as the first argument to creating a GenericPrincipal, which I then assign to Thread.Curr