dvanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Griffiths
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:19 PM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Msgbox Question
>
> > Yes, especially seeing as MS have selfishly sealed any
Uh, you can't inherit from a static class anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly, Brady
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:05 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] M
> Yes, especially seeing as MS have selfishly sealed anything
> remotely useful from sub-classing of the MessageBox class.
Sealing has nothing to do with it. The limitation is intrinsic to what
it does, and sealing contributes nothing to that problem.
In fact, it's not actually sealed in .NET v2.
> MessageBox() (the historical ancestor of the WinForms version) was
> historically a pretty black-box thing; if you need that level of
control
> you
> probably want to write your own similar routine.
>
> Ted Neward
Yes, especially seeing as MS have selfishly sealed anything remotely
useful from
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:52 PM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Msgbox Question
>
> Greetings:
>
Greetings:
Is it possible to program the location of a msgbox rather then
accepting the default. I can't seem to find any documentation that will
allow me to say "put this msgbox 100 pixels from the left border and down
378 pixels.
Thanks for any help you can give me.
Best regards,
Jerry
