TECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] OT Continous Integration
>
> I have to say I agree with the comments so far and to add I
> have used ORM since "InfoModeler Q" and have all Terry's
> books on the subject.
>
> In a new db design I would always start with
My 2 cents: cut out the Nke syndrome.
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sami
Vaaraniemi
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] OT Continous Integration
On
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:36:51 -0400, Gary Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The db is a different story. A developer opens enterprise mgr and makes a
>quick change and then "forgets" to notify anyone of the change script. We
>don't find out until the build or someone happens to do a get latest a
evelopment builds and find the integration
errors sooner.
Maybe "That dog just won't hunt".
Gary Davidson
From: Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [
vanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] OT Continous Integration
>
> > I'll add to my own post that the conceptual/ORM approach i
f
> Tiseo, Paul
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 2:55 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] OT Continous Integration
> >
> > Curious, are you using CruiseControl or Draco?
> >
> > To some degree, Frans is right. Controlling t
cussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tiseo, Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 2:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] OT Continous Integration
>
> Curious, are you using CruiseControl or Draco?
>
> To some deg
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Davidson
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] OT Continous Integration
>
> Are there any Continous Integration shops
In some work I've done for a client (SQL Server backend, not using .NET), there are
three different mechanisms to handle this. They all share a concept -- there is an
in-memory representation of the database schema. The details of the representation
are different.
There are routines that, giv
Forget Agile development for database models, as it results in ad-hoc
changes to a relational model which should be generated from an abstract
model in the first place.
This means that if you set up your relational model by generating it
from an ORM/NIAM model (http://www.orm.net) for example by
Are there any Continous Integration shops on the list? How do you handle
database changes?
I am working toward having my team use continous integration as part of our
move to AGILE programming methodologies.
The one problem I can't seem to solve (i.e make everyone happy) is changes
to the database.
11 matches
Mail list logo
