Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Peter Ritchie
Dino Esposito has an article in the latest MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/05/08/CuttingEdge/default.aspx) that discusses performance of passing serialized datasets. It's geared towards WebServices; but, it would still apply to remote objects. He also makes reference to "Returning

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Franklin Gray
"3. Implement a paging mechanism where you return X number of rows per page. X would typically be < 1000 That's what I normally do...have the form load with some kind of default filter and give the user the ability to change the filter. Works great for tables with some kind of date range. Howeve

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Marc Brooks
> The data I was going to keep in memory on the server was > "Catalog" data...data that doesn't change much at all if any. I'm > thinking we will be better served to store this info on the client > machine, reading directly from the DB when the app starts under a worker > thread. Can't you do tha

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Franklin Gray
005 09:09 AM "Potter, Mark S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Please respond to "Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics." Sent by "Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics." To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Diranieh, Yazan
ics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Franklin Gray Sent: 05 October 2005 15:29 To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed I've tried to speed things up as fast as possible. I now have the dataset in memory on the server and just pass the dataset

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Franklin Gray
ed .NET topics." To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM cc: Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed What's the data source? Are you getting one record at a time from the remote object; or are you receiving a dataset object? How big is each record?

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Potter, Mark S.
, 2005 10:01 AM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed + dataset version 1.1 serialize its parts to xml although you would have specified to serialize it binary... // Ryan On 10/5/05, Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's t

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Ryan Heath
+ dataset version 1.1 serialize its parts to xml although you would have specified to serialize it binary... // Ryan On 10/5/05, Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the data source? Are you getting one record at a time from the > remote object; or are you receiving a dataset object

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-05 Thread Peter Ritchie
What's the data source? Are you getting one record at a time from the remote object; or are you receiving a dataset object? How big is each record? An extra 30 seconds for remoting doesn't seem all that bad. If you're passing a dataset object over the wire (I'm assuming you are), it might be a

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting speed

2005-10-04 Thread Franklin Gray
using TCP, binary and port 999, I've been experiencing data loading speeds 7 times slower. Does that sound about right? Details: I read 30,000 records into a datatable when the remoted object get created (just oncesingleton). When I open the form with the grid on it, I call the remoted obj