Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-12-04 Thread Jeff Hughes
: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Halász Imre Levente Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting Thank you for the advise, I will try the socket thing. -Original

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-12-03 Thread Shawn A. Van Ness
settings; set the MTU, MSS and windows sizes to reduce acks and get better performance from TCP. A Btw the design pattern to follow for getting the necessary data immediately and getting the rest later on is called 'lazy load' > -Original Message----- > From: Moderated discussi

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-12-02 Thread Andrew Gayter
topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van Ness > Sent: 28 November 2003 20:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting > > It's interesting to consider why fragmenting would make your system f

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-12-01 Thread Halász Imre Levente
ynchronous data transfer using sockets. In your kind of scenario, I feel it is worth a serious try. Rathna Raj -Original Message- From: Shawn A. Van Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 2:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-12-01 Thread Rathna Raj
transfer using sockets. In your kind of scenario, I feel it is worth a serious try. Rathna Raj -Original Message- From: Shawn A. Van Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 2:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-12-01 Thread Luca Minudel
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:55:33 -0800, Shawn A. Van Ness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >...At the end of the day, >the same amount of bits are transmitted in either case (actually, >fragmenting will have to transfer more). Just wanna add that it is not all about amount of bits but also about response-

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-11-29 Thread Shawn A. Van Ness
It's interesting to consider why fragmenting would make your system faster -- I haven't tried it; I'll take your word for it. At the end of the day, the same amount of bits are transmitted in either case (actually, fragmenting will have to transfer more). Could it be all the large-block heap allo

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting

2003-11-27 Thread Levente
Hi to all, I'm new on this forum, i got your address from Ingo's site. My problem is the following. I read an articla written by Dmitry Belikov about transfering large data using .NET remoting. He advised to fragment the data and send it in parts, then reassamble it on the client side. I made some