If I was designing it, I would use /mm/dd instead.
Sébastien
On 1/11/08, Ron Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Using WCF to define service/data contracts:
>
> [ServiceContract(Namespace = "
> http://company.com/contracts/services/enrollment-core/01/11/2008";)]
> interface IEnro
Hi all,
Using WCF to define service/data contracts:
[ServiceContract(Namespace =
"http://company.com/contracts/services/enrollment-core/01/11/2008";)]
interface IEnrollmentCore
{
[OperationContract]
GetSomeDataResponse GetSomeData(GetSomeDataRequest request);
}
[DataContract(Namespace =
"h
Generally one does not just use a webservice for data access.
Generally one will treat the webservice as a facade and hide things
such as business logic and caching behind it. There are many benefits
to doing this such as deployment, reusability, security, and believe
it or performance can also be
Hi Shane,
There is a third option to consider. Even if I am not a big fan of it,
SQL Server 2005 allows for stored procedures to be exposed as web
services, directly hosted by SQL Server via the http.sys functionality
(the same used by IIS itself). It could sometimes provide the right
trade-off w
I agree with Peter 100% on this. Currently I am working on a project that
describes exactly what you wrote. I have a WinForm application accessing
the database through a WebService. We've ran a couple of tests regarding
data retrieval natively from WinForms and through the WebService and while
Adding a web service intermediary between an application and SQL Server is
always going to be slower. How much slower depends on how the web service
was written, unless the web service does some sort of value-added
processing (like being an entity broker or something) or caching.
There's nothing
Has anyone seen numbers on using a web service as an intermediary for your
data access vs directly accessing SQL server?
In an internet environment I think web services are a must in terms of
security and just the basic act of connecting. Not many places are willing
(or should) open the ports th
Create your directory under IIS for your application then run the
install from within the %SYSTEM%\Microsoft.Net\Framework\%VERSION%\
from the command promt run ASPNET_REGIIS -r
Then retry, usually it's a badly configured server scripts that are
the cause, if you have been able to run it in Dev
Hey,
I started playing around with web services last night. I created a simple
web service. If I run it, it starts up a dev version of IIS and it runs
correctly. I even added a client to the solution and it consumed the web
service fine.
I also started IIS up on my machine and published it to IIS.
And if you control both ends of the wire (both are using .Net), why aren't
you using Remoting. It is faster, and better, as long as you still don't
send business objects over the wire.
Here is a great thread on this exact topic (from the forums):
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?Po
m: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Chris Wuestefeld
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:59 AM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and
> making use of XSDs...
>
> Don:
@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and making use of
XSDs...
Don:
> DATASETS over Web Service = Very Bad
Shawn:
> Don is EXACTLY correct
Since this is the architecture of one of our most important apps (and it's
working quite well), I'm interested in the
AIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Seref Arikan
Sent: 11 October 2006 16:19
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and making use of
XSDs...
Hi Michael,
I'd like to hear your comments about why you say:
'and the only thing
worse i
FWIW, my experience is almost identical to Michael's. We've got a smart
client for internal use only, and data is retrieved and submitted via web
services and (frequently) DataSets.
There is no effort (nor any desire) to work with any client other than .Net.
In fact, we are using WSE to carry user
to why you shouldn't use them between two .Net systems, I'd
appreciate some pointers.
Thanks
--Michael
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Wuestefeld
Sent: 11 October 2006 14:59
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEV
vanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Wuestefeld
Sent: 11 October 2006 14:59
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and making use of
XSDs...
Don:
> DATASETS over Web Service = Very Bad
Shawn:
> Don is EXACT
Hi there,
Well, I can comment on this, based on my own experience. First and
foremost, I do not consider web services as a .NET spesific technology.
I use them a lot, usually for .net and j2ee integration, and when .net
is on the server side, using datasets for exposing data over web
services mean
, 2006 15:59
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and making use of
XSDs...
Don:
> DATASETS over Web Service = Very Bad
Shawn:
> Don is EXACTLY correct
Since this is the architecture of one of our most important apps (and
it's
wo
Don:
> DATASETS over Web Service = Very Bad
Shawn:
> Don is EXACTLY correct
Since this is the architecture of one of our most important apps (and it's
working quite well), I'm interested in the reasoning behind this. Does
anyone have pointers to articles?
===
This
; From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Demsak
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:15 AM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and
> making use of XSDs...
>
> Thanks Paul. I
http://www.xwebservices.com
http://www.soahub.com
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Joyce
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 4:15 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: SPAM-LOW: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSet
essage-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Joyce
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 14:57
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and making use of
XSDs...
Hi Paul.
Thanks for your reply. I've l
That's the part you write.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Joyce
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 14:57
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and makin
OM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services, DataSets and making use of
XSDs...
Hi all.
I'm just getting in to some XSD programming and could do with some
advice. This is quite a lengthy email for which I apologise in
advance.
I've been asked to create a webservice with some methods,
will handle the conversion to
and from xml for that class.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Joyce
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 13:15
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web ser
Hi all.
I'm just getting in to some XSD programming and could do with some
advice. This is quite a lengthy email for which I apologise in
advance.
I've been asked to create a webservice with some methods, one of which
is to resturn some customer data.
I am at the point where I would usually re
opics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Joyce
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 12:19 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services Book
Well I'm using 2005... hmm... I'll have a look around for a
2005-specific version, do you think much has chan
This may not be beginner level...But I recommend this one:
NET Web Services: Architecture and Implementation with .NET
http://www.amazon.com/NET-Web-Services-Architecture-Implementation/dp/0321113594/sr=1-37/qid=1157132285/ref=sr_1_37/102-6932440-1628139?ie=UTF8&s=books
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:22:
l SOA Architect
http://www.xwebservices.com
http://www.soahub.com
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Joyce
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 9:19 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] We
I would recommend supplementing a VS based book with something like
"Service-Oriented Architecture" which gives a higher level view ...
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0131858580?v=glance
Cheers,
Greg
On 9/1/06, Ben Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well I'm using 2005... hmm...
Well I'm using 2005... hmm... I'll have a look around for a
2005-specific version, do you think much has changed?
Ben
On 9/1/06, Peter Ritchie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you want a book that covers VS2005 or VS2003? The book you referenced
will be VS2003-based.
There isn't much in the way
Do you want a book that covers VS2005 or VS2003? The book you referenced
will be VS2003-based.
There isn't much in the way of VS2005-based books on Web Services. The
only book I've read on the topic is "MCAD/MCSD Self-Paced Training Kit:
Developing XML Web Services and Server Components with Mic
Hi. Can anyone recommend a good Web Services (.net) book, beginner level?
I saw this one:
oreilly.com -- Online Catalog: Programming .NET Web Services
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/prognetws/index.html?CMP=ILL-4GV796923290#details
- 8< -
Programming .NET Web Services
By Alex Ferrara,
Sigh. I wonder if there would be a way to "cut down" the web service so that
it only implements the methods your code will actually call, instead of being a
web service that supports a complete API.
You did say that you "don't own" the web service. If you have a WSDL and you
were to cut out l
uesday, July 18, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services - Serialization &
> Opimizations
>
> I think the issue is mainly the scale of this web service. I
> ran sgen to generate an XmlSerialization Dll with the
utes with children.
>
>
>Phil Wilson
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Phil
>D
>Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:44 PM
>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>Subject: Re: [A
>From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Phil D
>Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:44 PM
>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services - Serialization &
>Opimizations
>
>G
dren.
Phil Wilson
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Phil D
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:44 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services - Serialization &
Opimization
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:49 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services - Serialization &
Opimizations
You tried running sgen.exe against the types to pre-gen the
serialization assembly?
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
--
@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services - Serialization & Opimizations
I'm connecting to a web service with a VS 2005 client. It takes a long
time (nearly 3 minutes) before the code actually starts doing anything.
At first I thought this was a JIT thing going on, but I t
I'm connecting to a web service with a VS 2005 client. It takes a long
time (nearly 3 minutes) before the code actually starts doing anything.
At first I thought this was a JIT thing going on, but I think that
what's actually happening is that custom assemblies are being created to
handle the seria
M
Please respond to "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
Sent by "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
cc:
Subject:Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services
Google, baby!
http://www.google.com/sea
-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Franklin Gray
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:20 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services
Can VB.net's web services run on Apache Web server? My company uses
Apach
Can VB.net's web services run on Apache Web server? My company uses Apache Web
server but my group develops in VB.net.
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
ed discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chip Dunning
> Sent: 27 September 2005 17:14
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services & Threaded Client
>
> We have a client (C#) that is multi
Hi,
may I suggest this setting here :
best regards Allan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
We have a client (C#) that is multi-threaded working over my Web Services.
However, WS calls made from other threads within that client just disappear
into the ether. Looking over it using Etheral it shows no communication
outbound. Even though the WS call in question is on a different thread - it
Hi all ,
I have been tracking down a bizarre issue with web services .
Basically when I get 100 jobs from the server it will take 100 ms or so
, when I get null or 1 job it takes 250 ms or so . The jobs are an array
of a simple class.
I have measured the performance between 0 and 100 jobs and
Bill,
The problem may be related to the framework version that is handling
ASP.NET requests on the web server. If ASP.NET 1.0 is handling requests
for an assembly that is compiled against 1.1, I have seen similar
problems.
See the following MSDN article for more information:
http://msdn.microsof
There are 2 assemblies required on the client side to process the call. The
rest is behind the web service. One assembly defines all of the web service
return datatypes and the other one implements DateTimeHelper and so on. AS
I said the call actually succeeds in some environments.
I've tested thi
When you say "[t]he method in question" are you talking about the method that's
being invoked by the web service call? If so, the DLL that's needed by that
method needs to be available on the server side, not on the client side.
Or am I confused by what method needs the DLL?
At 07:57 AM 12/21/
I have a test harness WinForms app that uses Web Reference generated
proxy classes to call some web services. The method in question uses an
ancillary .dlls classes. This dll is deployed in the same folder as the
WinForm exe. When I make the web service call as Admin through the harness
on a W2K bo
but not difficult or risky, and it means you can
> > keep your object-oriented API clean and safe instead of compromising
> it
> > to meet the very different needs of the messaging.
> >
> > --
> > Ivan Towlson
> > White Carbon
> >
> >
> > -Original Message
the messaging.
>
> --
> Ivan Towlson
> White Carbon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pardee, Roy
> Sent: 23 November 2004 16:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCE
Ivan Towlson
Sent: Wednesday, 24 November 2004 4:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services and getting the proxy to use a
custom type
This could be done for input types but not for output types -- the object
returned from the Web Service call will still be a BaseThingy
ee, Roy
Sent: 23 November 2004 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services and getting the proxy to use
a custom type
Would it make sense to have your own proxy objects derive from the
vs.net (wsdl.exe?) generated proxies?
===
This list is
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services and getting the proxy to use
a custom type
Basically you should look at the proxy types as data transfer objects
that represent the xml messages being passed between client and server.
I would keep the proxy objects separate from your business
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2004 12:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web Services and getting the proxy to use a
custom type
Hi all,
I have a new project with 5 or 6 client programs and a server all
communicating to a web server. All communication is within the company.
What I
Hi all,
I have a new project with 5 or 6 client programs and a server all
communicating to a web server. All communication is within the company.
What I am trying to do is to build a DLL with some basic data classes
and some logic classes which all the clients share.
Unfortunately when creati
Hi,
Any pointers to this will be helpful.
Suppose i have a windows app which does the following
in sequence :-
1) Calls FetchMethod-1 of WebService-1 which fetches
data from DataBase-1 as XML-1
2) Calls UpdateMethod-2 of webservice2, with XML-1 as
method parameter ,which updates DataBase-2
3) C
Hi All.
I am new to implementation of Webservices. I am trying to pass a
structure which has an array of the same structure in it as a member
variable e.g.
struct Parent
{
child[] arrChild
}
child
{
string name;
int age;
child[] arrChild;
}
When I try to pass the structure Parent through t
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Merrill
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 4:49 PM
>
> It is uncommon for an application (using current MS technologies) to be
> able to handle changes to the columns returned by SELECT * wi
You're right -- if you need your applications to fully grok the updated schema, then
the applications will need to change. My point was that it's quite possible to make
many kinds of significant schema changes that end up having no impact at all on
applications, provided that the applications a
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:29 PM
>
> A considerate DBA would not do that. She will either make Name
> a computed column, or rename the underlying table and make a
> view Candidate that has a Name column -- even if it also has
> FirstName a
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:42 PM
>
> > I prefer SELECT *, because I think the risks in that scenario
> > is low, and made lower by proper application of other
> > practices.
>
> Feel free to code however you want ;) We try to adhere to th
> In your particular example, it is a bad practice to have similar
> column names across tables, especially any that have any chance
> of being joined.
Funny, that's exactly what you need to do when using the NATURAL JOIN[1] SQL
statement :) [2]
I agree, and I never do that, but sometimes you get
Inline
At 10:13 AM 2/17/2004, Tiseo, Paul wrote (in part)
>[snip]
>Two problems with the whole post, though:
>
>A) The first is the restricted consideration of the impact of the use of
>SELECT *, especially since you don't seem to contrast it with the risks of
>SELECT [commalisted columns]. What i
At 01:35 PM 2/16/2004, Tiseo, Paul wrote (in part)
>I don't have a real problem with views/sprocs that provide SELECT * like
>some seem to have. Furthermore, I can think of many scenarios that will
>cause views and/or sprocs to break based on some approach that makes a
>developer/DBA formally stip
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 8:17 PM
>
> -- and the same line from above now fails... simply because the view used
> a SELECT *
Well, one last word from me. Feel free to add, but I think my own viewpoint
doesn't need further explaining, so I'll
> I don't have a real problem with views/sprocs that provide
> SELECT * like some seem to have.
How about this sequence of lovely things:
-- DBA land
CREATE TABLE Candidate
(
Id INTEGER NOT NULL
, Name CHAR(40) NOT NULL
, DrivingPerk INTEGER
);
CREATE TABLE Perks
(
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 12:43 PM
>
> > Only adding new tables, and making FK columns pointing
> > to those tables NOT NULL, will cause a failure in
> > un-modified code. Even if such columns are NOT NULL,
> > if they have a default value -
> an app that uses SELECT * or has INSERT statements without
> a column list should not have been deployed, and they
> deserve to fail.
AMEN, BROTHER! Preach it!
That's a serious hot button for me, can you tell?
> Only adding new tables, and making FK columns pointing
> to those tables
At 02:51 PM 2/13/2004, Jeff Varszegi wrote
>J. Merrill wrote (in part):
>
>> One technique I've used successfully, but have not seen discussed here, is that of
>> having
>> application code that generates the code for stored procedures, triggers, and
>> views. Sometimes,
>> that code will be "co
J. Merrill wrote (in part):
> One technique I've used successfully, but have not seen discussed here, is that of
> having
> application code that generates the code for stored procedures, triggers, and views.
> Sometimes,
> that code will be "constant" -- but much of the time, it will vary base
> Frans Bouma wrote:
> > I see where you're heading to, that advising webservices as bad is
> > wrong. :)
>
> Not quite. I'm saying that it's wrong to advise that webservices are
> *always* bad. Sometimes they're bad. Sometimes they're not.
Ok, however I thought I made an exception al
At 07:49 PM 2/12/2004, Jeff Varszegi wrote (in part)
>I agree totally. And one completely-missed value of stored procedures is that they
>provide a
>layer of isolation from the raw database structure, allowing one to change the
>structure without
>breaking code. This applies to views, functions
Griffiths, Ian wrote:
> ...sharing types makes it hard for systems to evolve independently.
> With web services, it is entirely unnecessary to share type information.
I also overlooked this advantage of web services. If the need to
evolve client and server independently is great, web services
Ian Griffiths wrote:
> > Evolving public APIs is hard. But web services certainly
> > make it a lot easier, because there isn't that hard
> > dependence on a specific assembly being available at
> > both ends.
Frans Bouma replied:
> Erm... if the developer has written his webservice
> referencing
Andrew Hopper wrote:
> we are working with an external developer who is
> using Axis to consume some of our Web services. It's really a
> shining example of interoperability. But guess what he does
> on his side? Yep, he turns the XML into objects using Axis'
> type-mapping features.
But his types
(I'm not going to respond to the SQL stuff - I think you know I already
broadly agree, and you know I was just playing devil's advocate in order
to draw the analogy.)
Frans Bouma wrote:
> I see where you're heading to, that advising webservices
> as bad is wrong. :)
Not quite. I'm saying that i
I agree totally. And one completely-missed value of stored procedures is that they
provide a
layer of isolation from the raw database structure, allowing one to change the
structure without
breaking code. This applies to views, functions, etc. as well. Making a distributed
partitioned
view is
> However there are positive sides to the stored procedure
aspect
> though but they have nothing to do with performance or security. They
> have everything to do with how you look at things. If you think an
RDBMS
> should provide the first 'tier' in a system, which automatically
implies
> i
> However there are positive sides to the stored procedure aspect
> though but they have nothing to do with performance or security. They
> have everything to do with how you look at things. If you think an RDBMS
> should provide the first 'tier' in a system, which automatically implies
> i
Quoth J. Merrill:
> I'm not going to assert that I've fully thought this through, but couldn't
your "shared
> assembly" define an appropriate object class that has a constructor that
accepts
> XML? (It might also have a SetState method that resets the state
completely from
> XML, so you don't have
I'm not going to assert that I've fully thought this through, but couldn't your
"shared assembly" define an appropriate object class that has a constructor that
accepts XML? (It might also have a SetState method that resets the state completely
from XML, so you don't have to build a new object
> An analogy with web services vs. remoting just occurred to me
> that I though might be close to your heart, Frans.
>
> For many applications, the database is the bottleneck. There
> is no doubt that if you want the absolute best possible
> performance you can get out of most databases (and c
> > Ian Griffiths wrote:
> > >.NET remoting requires both ends to share type information. This
> > >entails a degree of coupling between your systems that is likely
to
> > >be highly undesirable.
>
> Frans Bouma replied:
> > Everybody who has written a remoting setup knows that this is easi
(Copied in part from my blog at http://www.dotnetified.com)
NOTE: Let me preface this by saying that "I want to believe." I really do
want to learn the so-called "right way" to do things, but I do reserve the
right to point out the emperor has no clothes if I feel it hampers my
productivity...
It
Here's my favorite analogy. Out of all distribution technologies, HTTP-
based web technology (and HTML) is the most successful one and dwarfs
other much more elegant and efficient technologies such as Corba, DCOM,
Java RMI, IBM MQ, MSMQ, RPC, .NET remoting etc.
This is a bit surprising considering
An analogy with web services vs. remoting just occurred to me that I
though might be close to your heart, Frans.
For many applications, the database is the bottleneck. There is no
doubt that if you want the absolute best possible performance you can
get out of most databases (and certainly out o
> Ian Griffiths wrote:
> >.NET remoting requires both ends to share type
> > information. This entails a degree of coupling
> > between your systems that is likely to be highly
> > undesirable.
Frans Bouma replied:
> Everybody who has written a remoting setup knows that
> this is easily circumve
borting it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ned" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:12 AM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services & server side multithreading.
> I am currently working on developing a web service that must use
&
#x27;reillys website.
greets
dominick
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ned
Gesendet: Montag, 18. August 2003 10:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services & server side multithr
rom: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ned
Sent: 08/18/2003 11:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services & server side multithreading.
I am currently working on developing a web service that must use
multithreading to achieve
I am currently working on developing a web service that must use
multithreading to achieve the required functionality. Because web services
are stateless I'm having a lot of difficulty keeping the auxillary thread
alive on the server. When the client connects to the server a new object,
serverObjec
I was reading documentation on the WSDK and found that most of what it is
trying to do is only available through Web Services (hence the name). My
question is when/if WS-Security, WS-Attachments, DIME, etc. will be
available for remoting? Anyone know? Anyone tried it yet?
Kevin Burton
You can re
du/in-notes/rfc2616.txt Section 14.8
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Web services authentication...
I have
Is the ISA Server set up to require SSL client certs? If that is the case
the NetworkCredential class does not support it.
Also, did you try the CredentialCache and add the NetworkCredential to it
with the authtype that matches that which the ISA server requires? Just
another thing to try.
On
I have a product developed in .Net (WinForm client + WebService server + a
number of background Window services to support it) in which the client has
worked fine behind various firewall configurations. Recently however we
have come across something that has stopped us dead in our tracks within a
--- "Chesnut, Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) a winForms client watches that directory for incoming
> messsages/jobs and does the appropriate processing of that request
It seems to do part of what I need to accomplish: read a soap message from
and invoke the a method with the parameters fr
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
