nal Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
> Sent: 22 April 2008 14:13
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] LINQ to SQL and inheritanc
>
> > On Fri,
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:04:38 +0200, Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> hmmmseems a little wierd, it would be nice to query and bind to Dogs
> >> directly (if you see what I mean).
> >>
> >> So I create a form and grid and bind to the Animals base Table (as it's
> >> the only one I've
t: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:05 AM
>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] LINQ to SQL and inheritanc
>
>> I'm just having a mess about with LINQ and inheritance, I've basically
>> created the canonical example, base class (lets say
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:04:38 +0200, Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm just having a mess about with LINQ and inheritance, I've basically
>> created the canonical example, base class (lets say Animal), and derived
>> class (lets say Dog) and set up the inheritance relations.
>>
>> I not
rans Bouma
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:05 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] LINQ to SQL and inheritanc
> I'm just having a mess about with LINQ and inheritance, I've basically
> created the canonical example, base class (lets say Animal)
> I'm just having a mess about with LINQ and inheritance, I've basically
> created the canonical example, base class (lets say Animal), and derived
> class (lets say Dog) and set up the inheritance relations.
>
> I notice that once I set up the relationship the Derived class is not
> present in the
