Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Registry cleaning in the .NET era

2004-01-19 Thread Merak
> It's not a matter of performance, it just that the obsolete > COM registry entries clutters up my view of what the system > is actually using. If you are in development mode of a .NET > component that exposes a COM interface, and you are > recompiling and running regasm repeatedly, it leaves all

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Registry cleaning in the .NET era

2004-01-19 Thread Andy Voelkel
>I used to micromanage my registry, back when it was consuming valueable >space in the paged pool... as of XP, the registry is mapped in chunks, >just like any other file (or database, for that matter). > >http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=292726 > >These days, I don't notice regclean

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Registry cleaning in the .NET era

2004-01-17 Thread Shawn A. Van Ness
I used to micromanage my registry, back when it was consuming valueable space in the paged pool... as of XP, the registry is mapped in chunks, just like any other file (or database, for that matter). http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=292726 These days, I don't notice regclean-esque

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Registry cleaning in the .NET era

2004-01-16 Thread Paul Stevens
I haven't tried it but you might want to have a look at Microsoft's Regclean.exe app -Original Message- From: Andy Voelkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 January 2004 07:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Registry cleaning in the .NET era (I asked the following questi