users
>> as well, and we're working on a fix. I'll post back here as soon as I have
>> an update.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Josh, AdWords API Team
>>
>> On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 12:41:23 PM UTC-4, Alexander Cavalli wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi Shwetha,
Yes, BatchJobProcessingError.INTERNAL_ERROR is the reason for the cancel.
Thanks!
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 11:30:13 AM UTC-5, Shwetha Vastrad (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Thank you for providing the sample BatchJobId. Do your BatchJobs get
> canceled due to Bat
We are also getting this error, pretty regularly. It seems to have started
sometime in the afternoon (CST) on 5/4/2017. From my testing it seems like
it might be happening more on jobs that use temp ids, in particular
multiple temp ids. Sample failed batch job id: 491491905
On Friday, May 5, 20
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Before I confirm this, let me check with the person here who wrote that
>> specific piece of code. I just want to make sure it's exactly correct for
>> you. I'll get back to you as soon as I hear back from him.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
oup, or customer level.
> 2. The BatchJobService does have logic in place that if a temporary ID is
> relied upon by another item in the job, then that kind of order has to be
> maintained. You are safe with your use case.
>
> Regards,
> Nadine, AdWords API Team
>
&
Hi Nadine,
Thanks for the info. A couple more clarifications, if you don't mind! :)
1. Reading that doc you sent on SET and ADD being somewhat interchangeable,
there's a note about "If the SET operator is used in a case where an ad
extension does not exist, a new ad extension is added." What fi
Hi Vishal,
I made two changes between my first and second examples. They were:
1. Usage of two ADD operators (first example) vs ADD then SET (second
example)
2. Usage of a fully defined extension, i.e. including sitelink_text and
sitelink_final_urls (first example) vs a partially defined extens
Hi Vishal,
I think it is the same, or nearly so. The extension setting object is a
nested object in either case. In the first one I saved that object to a var
first and it was identical in both campaign extension settings, and in the
second one I inlined it and the SET operation didn't include
7966",
"status": "ENABLED",
"feed_type": "SITELINK",
"extension_feed_item_type": "SitelinkFeedItem",
"sitelink_text": "Store Hours",
"sitelink_fi
Hi Vishal,
Thanks for the information. Let me rephrase just to make sure I'm
understanding properly.
You're suggesting that, if I have a new sitelink that I want to tie to
multiple campaigns, I should
1) add that sitelink to Campaign 1 using the
CampaignExtensionSettingService (not as part of
ls": {
"urls": "http://www.example.com/";
}
},
"platform_restrictions": "NONE"
}
}
},
"index": "13"
}
Notably, I think, the feed item ids are not the same.
Just to be
Hi Vishal,
The -5 is getting used in the "extension_setting" object, which is inserted
into both campaign_extensions. I assumed that without that id the API would
not recognize that I wanted to use the same extension_setting for both
campaigns (and it would make two identical ones, instead). I'
Hi there,
This is somewhat related to an earlier discussion I had with Nadine
Sundquist here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/adwords-api/szTBX5B5d8E/jkRkPuOMDgAJ
I would like to generate sitelinks that are shared between multiple
campaigns using the Bat
u're coding in another language, the other client
> libraries <https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/clientlibraries>
> also have the same example.
>
> Glad to help,
> Nadine, AdWords API Team
>
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 11:13:55 AM UTC-4, Alexan
.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201506/CampaignExtensionSettingService.CampaignExtensionSetting>
>
> with your associated SiteLinkFeedItems
> <https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201506/CampaignExtensionSettingService.SitelinkFeedItem>
>
>
Hi Umesh,
Thanks for the suggestion, that was what I was originally considering
doing. But it seems like that will make different sitelinks across the
campaigns, unless I use sitelinks that already exist (i.e. ones that I have
the Adwords IDs for) and the SET operation within mutate. I'd like t
Thanks Umesh. Wouldn't that apply the sitelinks to all campaigns in the
account? If so, is there a way to set the sitelinks for only specific
campaigns, rather than account-wide?
On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 4:21:35 PM UTC-5, Umesh Dengale wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> You could use the Customer
I need to build a service that uses the Adwords API to manage sitelinks
that can be shared across multiple campaigns. I've previously used the
various Feed services to handle this, but I noticed there are newer
Extension Setting services that simplify the mapping process for the
standard matchi
Nevermind. This appears to be a bug with the ruby gem, which recently
released v0.15.2. That version is causing this error; 0.15.1 is still
working properly. I'll file an issue on the github repo issue list.
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 1:37:29 PM UTC-5, Alexander Cavalli wrote:
>
&g
It looks like as part of the v201506 API the KeywordText field was removed
from some reporting endpoints
The KeywordText,PlacementUrl, and UserListIdfields were removed since they
> were duplicates of the Criteriacolumn.
I am still using the v201502 API, but I am now getting errors like this
20 matches
Mail list logo
