Getting different volume of search (API vs Keyword planner)

2023-07-07 Thread Eliav Lankri
Hello We're using the Ads API to get volume of search for terms by country. But the issue is that we're getting totally differet numbers from the Keyword planner. What could be the issue? or what the Dev should check? *gbp to usd calculator *(United Kingdom) Keyword Planner: 720 Our tool/Ads AP

Re: getting different volume of search (api vs keyword planner)

2023-10-24 Thread Jabez Tadesse
Getting the exact type of behaviour too, please let us know if there are any developments in this public thread ... 👍 On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 3:19:01 AM UTC-7 Google Ads API Forum Advisor wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for responding back. > > You may refer to the context below for our previous

Re: getting different volume of search (api vs keyword planner)

2023-10-25 Thread 'Google Ads API Forum Advisor' via Google Ads API and AdWords API Forum
Hi, Thank you for getting back to us. According to the Google Ads dashboard , I can confirm that there is no issue in the Google Ads API. To analyse the issue further as mentioned earlier, could you please provide us with the complete API logs (request and response with request-id and request

RE: getting different volume of search (api vs keyword planner)

2023-07-07 Thread 'Google Ads API Forum Advisor' via Google Ads API and AdWords API Forum
Hi, Thank you for reaching out to Google Ads API Forum. Moving forward with your concern, can you provide us with the complete API logs (request and response with request-id and request header) generated on your end? This is so we can check on our end as well and investigate further. Additiona

Re: getting different volume of search (api vs keyword planner)

2023-07-08 Thread Eliav Lankri
Can you please re-write the email? I can't see it and the link is not to the email. Btw, general question, to get the volume of search, like Keyword planner, should we use the following? On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 5:38:37 PM UTC+3 Google Ads API Forum Advisor wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you fo