Greetings!
This was sent over to me to double-check on this. I've never seen the case
make a difference. The only limitation I know of on mobile device IDs is
that they will only stay in the list for about about 540 days as members.
Perhaps, the device IDs that you're getting come from a differe
Hello,
The upload is done via Googleads API call in Scala program.
Thanks
On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 8:32:39 PM UTC+5:30,
googleadsapi-forumadvisor wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Could you please confirm if you're seeing this discrepancy while uploading
> the lists with and without casing fro
Hello,
Could you please confirm if you're seeing this discrepancy while uploading
the lists with and without casing from the Google Ads UI? If yes, could you
please share the request and response logs for the upload using Reply
privately to author option.
Thanks,
Bharani, Google Ads API Team
=
I am not facing any errors but with lowercase my match display network
member count were more when compared to without any casing conversion. So
wanted to understand the reason behind it
Thanks
On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 11:02:00 PM UTC+5:30, ci.wb...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
Hello,
There are no specific limitations on the Mobile Ids casing. You should be
able to upload both IDFA or Google Advertising IDs without any issues.
Please let me know if you're facing an issue.
Thanks,
Bharani, Google Ads API Team
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find
Hi Team,
I dont see a requirement mentioned in the Mobile_id upload
template(attached) to convert the mobile_ids to lowercase in the file
before uploading. Could you please confirm whether mobile_ids need to be
converted to lower case(as apple ids and google ids are of different
casing) bef
