Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread Steve Jones
Thats pretty sweet. We are looking for a 4 cable cat 5/6 due to some restrictions on one of our mutli site landlords On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:13 AM Eric Muehleisen wrote: > We've had great results with Shireen's Hybrid cable. We've used it on a > bunch of Cambium 670 point to point installs. Pl

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread Eric Muehleisen
We've had great results with Shireen's Hybrid cable. We've used it on a bunch of Cambium 670 point to point installs. Planning on using it for our 3ghz 450M. https://www.shireeninc.com/osc/dfp-1246-data-fiber-power-composite-cable On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:01 AM dave wrote: > We do, > We are u

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread Josh Baird
So you aren't doing any fiber or DC distribution at the top? You are just running a separate strand of fiber and DC up the tower for each radio? On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:01 AM dave wrote: > We do, > We are using #14x4 UV rated power wire and using TAC2 SM LC-LC Fiber for > each radio. Each ra

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread dave
We do,  We are using #14x4 UV rated power wire and using TAC2 SM LC-LC Fiber for each radio. Each radio also gets Superior Essex Armor Cat6 BBDGE cable for Timing and POE in case of 5Ghz. U could get custom cables made from Best-tronics that have 4 wire#14 with a pair of Fibers. That is my nex

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread Steve Jones
CMM4 was solid, just awful for management. We are moving to all gas tube, I trust chuck to undersell his products enough that the clamp delay or whatever its called is worth the risk On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:26 AM dave wrote: > We have a few cmm5 in service and had absolutely no issues with them

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread Josh Baird
Do you have a solution for fiber+power to each radio? We're looking at a few different options right now.. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:26 AM dave wrote: > We have a few cmm5 in service and had absolutely no issues with them and > yes pricey for sure but havent went to a site for a cmm5 issue ever

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-03-02 Thread dave
We have a few cmm5 in service and had absolutely no issues with them and yes pricey for sure but havent went to a site for a cmm5 issue ever. Cmm4 did what it was designed to do  and we still  have a couple in service. If I had learned to ground them properly I would not of had to replace any of

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
We typically recommend one of the following options from our product line: 1) For sites with room for a rackmount device, a RackInjector with a PDU card and a Cambium Sync Card. This will provide Power via the PDU card to the unit, and sync via the cambium sync card. You'll need a syncbox basi

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Sean Heskett
CMM5 is worse than the CMM4. and yes the control board for the CMM5 is a Pi -sean On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:44 PM Josh Baird wrote: > Yes, the CMM4 was horrible. We still have a few as well. > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Jones > wrote: > >> CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Josh Baird
Yes, the CMM4 was horrible. We still have a few as well. On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Jones wrote: > CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped the coin for a few CMM4 (still have > one NIB) and were sorely disappointed in what a shitshow it was of cobbled > components at crazy high cost, h

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Steve Jones
CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped the coin for a few CMM4 (still have one NIB) and were sorely disappointed in what a shitshow it was of cobbled components at crazy high cost, half web interface, half CLI, and IIRC there was java involved too. I wont even look at a CMM5 On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Josh Baird
Was it the CMM5 that was basically a big metal box with a tiny Raspberry Pi in it? On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:21 PM Sean Heskett wrote: > We use the PacketFlux rack injector - great product and easy to use for > lots of different equipment types. > > We ripped out all of our CMM5s because honestl

Re: [AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Sean Heskett
We use the PacketFlux rack injector - great product and easy to use for lots of different equipment types. We ripped out all of our CMM5s because honestly they are a PITA and a very clunky solution. -Sean On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Shayne Lebrun wrote: > What are the various options for

[AFMUG] 450m 365 sync

2020-02-27 Thread Shayne Lebrun
What are the various options for providing sync to a 3.65 450M? -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com