Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-04 Thread That One Guy
10 On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:35 PM, David Milholen wrote: > I am going to assume that is a 5Mhz wide channel? > this is about what we would expect but I see double that in a 10mhz wide > channel. > We love our 3.65 in our area. We are using everything stock on most of our > deployments and insta

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread David Milholen
I am going to assume that is a 5Mhz wide channel? this is about what we would expect but I see double that in a 10mhz wide channel. We love our 3.65 in our area. We are using everything stock on most of our deployments and installs. On 2/3/2015 1:55 PM, That One Guy wrote: 9 miles and some ch

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Josh Luthman
Now we're all cornfoosed Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 3, 2015 7:19 PM, "Dan Petermann" wrote: > Crap! > > I meant PMP450 not PTP. > > is it still monday? > > > On Feb 3, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Ryan Ray wrote: > > -71 @ 18 miles

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Dan Petermann
Crap! I meant PMP450 not PTP. is it still monday? On Feb 3, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Ryan Ray wrote: > -71 @ 18 miles. 45.79Mb/s down, 11Mb up. > > AP has the Cambium antenna, SM has a reflector. > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dan Petermann wrote: > Thank you! Just what I needed. > On

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Ryan Ray
oh sorry you were looking for PTP not PMP. Ignore! On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Ryan Ray wrote: > -71 @ 18 miles. 45.79Mb/s down, 11Mb up. > > AP has the Cambium antenna, SM has a reflector. > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dan Petermann wrote: > >> Thank you! Just what I needed. >> O

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Ryan Ray
-71 @ 18 miles. 45.79Mb/s down, 11Mb up. AP has the Cambium antenna, SM has a reflector. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dan Petermann wrote: > Thank you! Just what I needed. > On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > > You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Dan Petermann
Thank you! Just what I needed. On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector > >> 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with >> output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it >> >

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Adam Moffett
You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink Status Receive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Rat

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Josh Luthman
Los 10 megs? Ubnt... On Feb 3, 2015 2:41 PM, "Dan Petermann" wrote: > What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? > > What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. >

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread That One Guy
9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink StatusReceive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments

[AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450

2015-02-03 Thread Dan Petermann
What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate.