- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 10:32:26 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
That's not the intent, no. There are far better and also open ways.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet
2017 9:39:48 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
On 4/8/17 7:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> SNMP needs to die, but our industry isn't ready for it.
As difficult as SNMP can be sometimes, it is universal. I don't want to
go back to a world where each vendor requires their own proprietary
On 4/8/17 7:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
SNMP needs to die, but our industry isn't ready for it.
As difficult as SNMP can be sometimes, it is universal. I don't want to
go back to a world where each vendor requires their own proprietary
thing that you have to buy.
~Seth
acronyms than you can shake a stick at.
-- Original Message --
From: "SmarterBroadband" < li...@sbb.net >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 4/7/2017 3:09:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Like you we use Telrad WiMAX. It has been good for us. We will also transition
to LTE
.harn...@baicells.com<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>
www.facebook.com/baicells<http://www.facebook.com/baicells>
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Friday, April 7, 2017 4:01 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
We have somethin
Yup, I did mean all network elements.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson"
To: "af@afmug.com"
Sent: 4/7/2017 4:20:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Why does it necessarily cause more performance problems than TR-69?
Wouldn't TCP-based TR-69 ha
). UL resource blocks available to UEs would
have no bearing on the ability to manage an eNB with SNMP.
-- Nathan
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 1:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
SNMP eats up a lot of resource block
2) 922-1443
<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com> rick.harn...@baicells.com
<http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 4:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65
k at.
-- Original Message --
From: "SmarterBroadband"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 4/7/2017 3:09:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Like you we use Telrad WiMAX. It has been good for us. We will also
transition to LTE soon.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
ote:
>> > We still have it, yes. Transitioning to LTE.
>> > If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
>> >
>> > If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Original Me
Baird"
To: "af@afmug.com"
Sent: 4/7/2017 3:23:58 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
450 isn't Wimax.. so, it's really not the same.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Matt
wrote:
How does it stack up to 450 to anyone who has done both?
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:13 PM
t; > If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
> >
> > If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
> >
> >
> > -- Original Message --
> > From: "Philip Rankin"
> > To: "af"
hink we can be friends.
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Philip Rankin"
> To: "af"
> Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM
> Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
>
> Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax?
>
> Has any other technology/wireless protocol come along th
Like you we use Telrad WiMAX. It has been good for us. We will also
transition to LTE soon.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 11:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
We still have it, yes. Transitioning
lways buggy. Features important to me
were never there. Performance was never that great either.
-- Original Message --
From: "Philip Rankin"
To: "af"
Sent: 4/7/2017 2:21:01 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Hi Adam,
Curious about your issues with Wimax?
;
>> We still have it, yes. Transitioning to LTE.
>> If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
>>
>> If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Philip
itioning to LTE.
> If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
>
> If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Philip Rankin"
> To: "af"
> Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:
I don't think we can be friends.
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Philip Rankin"
> To: "af"
> Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM
> Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
>
> Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax?
>
> Has any other technology
We still have it, yes. Transitioning to LTE.
If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
-- Original Message --
From: "Philip Rankin"
To: "af"
Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM
Su
I think pretty much everyone is switching over to LTE in 3.65ghz these days
(aside from Canopy stuff, but that doesn't really compare for nLOS
capabilities)... Baicells and Telrad are probably the most common at this
point.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Philip Rankin
wrote:
> Is anyone still
Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax?
Has any other technology/wireless protocol come along that can compete with
Wimax's superior nLos capability? At any other bands? I have no interest
in 900.
Thanks in advance for any feedback!
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Bo
ation that dramatically
improved their use of the product.
Nathan Stooke is the CEO of the WISPER in St. Louis.
- Original Message -
From: Philip Rankin
To: af
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:34 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Hey all,
I'm curious, whom on t
Hey all,
I'm curious, whom on the list is operating 3.65 GHz Wimax and what Base
Station equipment do you operate? More specifically, is anyone using
Purewave 6636 base stations?
phil
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
I'm looking for a source for used, cheap, 3.65 wimax outdoor cpe
equipment. Anyone have any for sale. PM me at wireless...@gmail.com
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
24 matches
Mail list logo
