Re: [AFMUG] 477 for dummys

2014-09-19 Thread Simon Westlake via Af
Come on Steve, get upgraded! You've still got a couple of weeks! On 9/19/2014 2:45 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: --- [ That One Guy wrote ]: --- you have to be on v10, we are not. I believe he said we can import data to the demo server and do something On F

Re: [AFMUG] 477 for dummys

2014-09-19 Thread That One Guy via Af
--- [ That One Guy wrote ]: ---you have to be on v10, we are not. I believe he said we can import data to the demo server and do something On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Cameron Crum via Af wrote: > I'm pretty sure Simon said that PowerCode would create the fi

Re: [AFMUG] 477 for dummys

2014-09-19 Thread Cameron Crum via Af
I'm pretty sure Simon said that PowerCode would create the files for you didn't he? Wouldn't that be your easier route? On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Moffett via Af wrote: > They want census blocks where you have service deployed, and then census > tracts where actual subscribers are. T

Re: [AFMUG] 477 for dummys

2014-09-19 Thread Adam Moffett via Af
They want census blocks where you have service deployed, and then census tracts where actual subscribers are. The latter can still come out of your billing system. I'm sure how 2-year old friendly you can get. I downloaded census block shape files (.shp) from the census web site. Imported t

[AFMUG] 477 for dummys

2014-09-18 Thread That One Guy via Af
The previous 477 filing was confusing enough to me. I submittted data that was generated for me from our billing system without actually knowing what exactly it was or how to verify it was accurate. Now with the new system, Im completely lost. Im afraid of the feds and their black helicopters that