Hey Ubiquiti people who might be watching the list,
If you're watching the list, please contact me... I have an AF24 link with
"perfect" RF characteristics that won't pass a 500 Mbps full duplex RFC2544
test. It also fails MEF y.1731 tests at the same data rate.
1.70 km, -55 RSL symmetric on bot
What are the flow control settings? I remember seeing a graph that flow
control has a big effect on whether AirFibers can hit near the full speed.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Hey Ubiquiti people who might be watching the list,
>
> If you're watching the list, please co
Same results for sequence errors either with or without flow control
enabled on the radios, and switch ports that connect to them.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Colin Stanners wrote:
> What are the flow control settings? I remember seeing a graph that flow
> control has a big effect on whet
Siklu would be a better radio for this link.
I don't recall anyone ever running that test on Airfiber radios from what
I've read.
On Jan 15, 2018 11:27 AM, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote:
Same results for sequence errors either with or without flow control
enabled on the radios, and switch ports that conn
You could try turning off inband mangement if you have not already done so.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Same results for sequence errors either with or without flow control
> enabled on the radios, and switch ports that connect to them.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at
I recall the AF team in the Chicago area running Exfo or JDSU RFC2544 tests
on some of their test links, and getting them to pass.
Have seen the same results with flow control turned on or off. Right now I
can't turn off inband management because we will lose visibility into the
far end of the rad
Hi.
I actually ran those tests with Performant/Accedian, which caused UBNT to
put flow control in. Inband management will still cause issues. Your max
throughput will drop, but it should be stable. I still have the old test
results around here somewhere.
Remember, these radios have like virtually
I ended up disabling inband management on the remote end temporarily, and
got the same results... We are likely replacing the radio set with
something that is actually 1GbE line rate and will pass frames sequentially.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I actually
You would have to disable inband on both ends, and even then I
wouldn't expect it to go much above 550 or 600MBps on a RFC2544 test.
You said it youself: "This link performs normally with 0.00% packet
loss and full duplex layer 3 IP traffic. Between Adva metro Ethernet
equipment we can't get a 500