Within 100 feet will probably be inside the radials.
So a no go I would think.
On 7/17/2017 4:10 PM, George Skorup wrote:
The cell tower can become a radiator or director of the AM
transmitter/antenna system and distort their pattern. It needs
engineering and will typically get detuning
@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AM Tower vs Cell site
>From what the radio engineer told me it would need to be less than 1/4 of the
>height, or it would be a quarter wavelength and could rebroadcast off of the
>tower steel.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel.
>From what the radio engineer told me it would need to be less than 1/4 of
the height, or it would be a quarter wavelength and could rebroadcast off
of the tower steel.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Jaime Solorza
wrote:
>
https://www.lbagroup.com/blog/is-this-cell-tower-detuned/
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:10 PM, George Skorup
wrote:
> The cell tower can become a radiator or director of the AM
> transmitter/antenna system and distort
The cell tower can become a radiator or director of the AM
transmitter/antenna system and distort their pattern. It needs
engineering and will typically get detuning elements. 100 feet may not
even work or perhaps it won't matter, I don't know.
On 7/17/2017 3:53 PM, Dave wrote:
I am looking
I am looking for someone who can answer a question about putting a cell
tower with 2 carriers within 100' of an AM tower?
Would there be issues with a cell carrier being to close to an AM site?
--