Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2016-03-09 Thread Bill Prince
On board _*H*_eptadekillion (byte) _*D*_isk _*D*_rive. Enough on board storage to hold everything currently digitized. bp On 2/4/2015 5:25 PM, Nate Burke wrote: The HDD is referring to the Proprietary SSD that's inside the unit. It cashes a copy of the whole internet, that's why it's so fas

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Mathew Howard
he whole thing >> >> *From:* Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:03 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X >> >> Do unii1 first. Save your 3 GHz! >> >> You can replace Rockets with af5x, though it isn&#x

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
From:* Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:14 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > > A. Easiest and using the same spectrum as before. The blue cables from > Mikrotik are really sweet. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direc

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Ken Hohhof
This? http://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-flex-guide-rp-sma-to-rp-sma-patch-cable-19-7in.html From: Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:14 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X A. Easiest and using the same spectrum as before. The blue cables from Mikrotik are

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
ursday, August 13, 2015 3:03 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > Do unii1 first. Save your 3 GHz! > > You can replace Rockets with af5x, though it isn't a simple drop in > replacement from what I found =( > > > Josh Luthman > Office:

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Ken Hohhof
: Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:03 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Do unii1 first. Save your 3 GHz! You can replace Rockets with af5x, though it isn't a simple drop in replacement from what I found =( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
-NII-1, > but now could maybe stay in 3.65. > > *From:* Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2015 2:51 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > > The cheapest alternative for 3.65 is probably ptp450, which is still more > expensive and only like a

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Ken Hohhof
, but now could maybe stay in 3.65. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 2:51 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X The cheapest alternative for 3.65 is probably ptp450, which is still more expensive and only like a quarter the capacity, so it's not bad for what it is

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
rom the 5x. >>> On Aug 13, 2015 12:10 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: >>> >>>> Someone sent me this photo, I hope nothing we wanted was in any of >>>> those containers! >>>> >>>> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Mathew Howard
gt; >>> Someone sent me this photo, I hope nothing we wanted was in any of those >>> containers! >>> >>> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen >>> Sent: Wednes

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
t; -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X >> >> On 8/12/15 13:55, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >>> I hope they weren’t shipping out of the port of Tianjin (dramatic video): >>> http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/asia/china-port-explosion/index.html >>> >> >> That was the boat all the DFS certs were on. >> >> ~Seth >> >

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Brett A Mansfield
me this photo, I hope nothing we wanted was in any of those >> containers! >> >> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >> >> >> -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> S

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Ben Moore
;>> On Aug 13, 2015 12:10 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: >>>>> Someone sent me this photo, I hope nothing we wanted was in any of those >>>>> containers! >>>>> >>>>> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >>>>> >>>>&

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
> Someone sent me this photo, I hope nothing we wanted was in any of those >> containers! >> >> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >> >> >> -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM >> To: af@afmug.co

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Ben Moore
e nothing we wanted was in any of those >>> containers! >>> >>> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM >>> To: af@

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Keefe John
fmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X On 8/12/15 13:55, Ken Hohhof wrote: I hope they weren’t shipping out of the port of Tianjin (dramatic video): http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/asia/china-port-explosion/index.html That was

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Keefe John
e- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X On 8/12/15 13:55, Ken Hohhof wrote: I hope they weren’t shipping out of the port of Tianjin (dramati

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Josh Luthman
anted was in any of those >> containers! >> >> More seriously, many deaths and injuries. >> >> >> -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X >>

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Mathew Howard
ted was in any of those > containers! > > More seriously, many deaths and injuries. > > > -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > On 8/12/15 13:55, Ken Hohhof wro

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-13 Thread Ken Hohhof
Someone sent me this photo, I hope nothing we wanted was in any of those containers! More seriously, many deaths and injuries. -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:25 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X On 8/12/15 13:55, Ken

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-12 Thread Patrick Leary
PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X On 8/10/15 16:31, Josh Luthman wrote: > RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz > backhauls because it "penetrates better". > And 3GHz users. Will Telrad have enough magic to overcome a cheap UBNT

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-12 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 8/12/15 13:55, Ken Hohhof wrote: I hope they weren’t shipping out of the port of Tianjin (dramatic video): http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/asia/china-port-explosion/index.html That was the boat all the DFS certs were on. ~Seth

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-12 Thread Ken Hohhof
I hope they weren’t shipping out of the port of Tianjin (dramatic video): http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/asia/china-port-explosion/index.html From: Ben Moore Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X They are on the boat ;) Can fit 1 per boat so

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Jaime Solorza
ces.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:09 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > 2.4GHz has been an RF sewer for the past several years, can't say this > will do too much more damage at this point. > > *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DRO

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Glen Waldrop
It can probably cook popcorn at 15 feet. Only one kernel at a time, but... From: Ben Moore Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X They are on the boat ;) Can fit 1 per boat so it may be a while... On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ken

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Ben Moore
:* Ben Moore > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:57 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > We are working on a 12 footer now for you Ken. > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > >> At least in 2.4 you can still crank up the an

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Ken Hohhof
When can I get a beta unit? FYI, I got my AF-5G23-S45 order, I have one assembled here on my desk. Just scale it up to 12 feet. From: Ben Moore Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:57 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X We are working on a 12 footer now for you Ken. On Tue

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Ben Moore
From:* r...@rjr-services.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:09 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > 2.4GHz has been an RF sewer for the past several years, can't say this > will do too much more damage at this point. > > *Sent from

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Ken Hohhof
At least in 2.4 you can still crank up the antenna gain on a PTP link, subject to the 1-for-3 rule, unlike 5 GHz. OK, where do I buy a 10 ft dual pol dish for 2.4 GHz? From: r...@rjr-services.com Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:09 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X 2.4GHz

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread ron
2.4GHz has been an RF sewer for the past several years, can't say this will do too much more damage at this point. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Josh Luthman wrote: -- This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Mike Hammett
est-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Rory Conaway" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 7:39:14 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X So how does it compare against WiMax in an NLOS environment? Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Keef

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-11 Thread Rory Conaway
So how does it compare against WiMax in an NLOS environment? Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Keefe John Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X I could see use for it. On 8/10/2015 7:19 PM, Jon Langeler wrote: Maybe it&#

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Keefe John
*To:* af <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* [AFMUG] AirFiber X Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X now!!! AF-2Xhttps://ubcdn.co/media/images/product/af-2x/af5t-product-model-small.png, (default)

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread dmmoffett
April 17. Then again, this may just be part 15 not part 90 >> or part 96 if that’s what CBRS is under. >> >> >> From: List S >> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:42 PM >> To: af >> Subject: [AFMUG] AirFiber X >> >> Anyone else see

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Jon Langeler
not part 90 >> or part 96 if that’s what CBRS is under. >> >> >> From: List S >> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:42 PM >> To: af >> Subject: [AFMUG] AirFiber X >> >> Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Mathew Howard
gt; rules that went away April 17. Then again, this may just be part 15 not > part 90 or part 96 if that’s what CBRS is under. > > > *From:* List S > *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2015 5:42 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > Anyone else see Ubiquiti's w

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Jason McKemie
----- > *From: *"Josh Luthman" > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 6:31:32 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls > because it "penetrates better". >

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Ken Hohhof
2 GHz doesn’t have to be 2.4 GHz? From: Tim Reichhart Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:46 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X I dont see an point AF in 2ghz setup. Tim -- -Original Message

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Jaime Solorza
.com > Date: 08/10/15 07:31 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls > because it "penetrates better". > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Su

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Tim Reichhart
I dont see an point AF in 2ghz setup. Tim -Original Message- From: "Josh Luthman" To: af@afmug.com Date: 08/10/15 07:31 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls because it "penetrates better".

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Mike Hammett
From: "Josh Luthman" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:31:32 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls because it "penetrates better". Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 8/10/15 16:31, Josh Luthman wrote: RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls because it "penetrates better". And 3GHz users. Will Telrad have enough magic to overcome a cheap UBNT noise generator? ~Seth

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Mike Hammett
riginal Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:31:32 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls because it "penetrates better". Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Mike Hammett
ginal Message - From: "Lewis Bergman" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:32:00 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X That's what licensed is for. On Mon, Aug 10, 2015, 6:24 PM Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: If they have PtMP up thei

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Lewis Bergman
change > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------ > *From: *"Jon Langeler" > *To: *af@af

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Josh Luthman
RIP 2 GHZ band. Thanks to Ubnt we have kids putting up 50 MHz backhauls because it "penetrates better". Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 10, 2015 6:59 PM, "Ben Moore" wrote: > Yes, full 50MHz in 3GHz band... > > On Mon, Aug 10

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Mike Hammett
t;Jon Langeler" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:18:43 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Unfortunately those aren't really needed products... Sent from my iPhone On Aug 10, 2015, at 6:42 PM, List S < li...@silverlakeinternet.com > wrote: Anyone else s

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Jon Langeler
Unfortunately those aren't really needed products... Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 10, 2015, at 6:42 PM, List S wrote: > > Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X now!!! > > > > AF-2X > > AF-3X > > AF-5X > Frequency 2.4 GHz 3 GHz 5 GHz > Throughput

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread List S
that went away April 17. Then again, this may just be part 15 not part 90 or part 96 if that’s what CBRS is under. From: List S Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:42 PM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirF

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Ben Moore
Yes, full 50MHz in 3GHz band... On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, List S wrote: > Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X > now!!! > > > [image: AF-2X] > AF-2X > [image: AF-3X] > AF-3X > [image: AF-5X] > AF-5X > Frequency2.4 GHz3 GHz5 GHzThroughput500+ Mbps500+ Mbp

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Jaime Solorza
Jamming tools! On Aug 10, 2015 4:42 PM, "List S" wrote: > Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X > now!!! > > > [image: AF-2X] > AF-2X > [image: AF-3X] > AF-3X > [image: AF-5X] > AF-5X > Frequency2.4 GHz3 GHz5 GHzThroughput500+ Mbps500+ Mbps500+ MbpsRange200+

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Ken Hohhof
: List S Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:42 PM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X now!!! AF-2X AF-3X AF-5X Frequency 2.4 GHz 3 GHz 5 GHz Throughput 500+ Mbps 500+ Mbps 500+

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread Mike Hammett
To: "af" Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:42:03 PM Subject: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X now!!! AF-2X AF-2X AF-3X AF-3X AF-5X AF-5X Frequency 2.4 GHz 3 GHz 5 GHz Throughput 500+ Mbps

[AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-08-10 Thread List S
Anyone else see Ubiquiti's website? It shows three kinds of AirFiber X now!!! AF-2X AF-3X AF-5X Frequency 2.4 GHz 3 GHz 5 GHz Throughput 500+ Mbps 500+ Mbps 500+ Mbps Range 200+ km 200+ km 200+ km I'm getting excited!!! I know there was talk about it, but I haven't seen any offi

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
I can't wait until they start rating hard drives at the "number of internets you can download onto the drive". "This is a 6 internets drive!" (j/k ;)) On 02/04/2015 04:34 PM, Bill Prince wrote: On board _*H*_eptadekillion (byte) _*D*_isk _*D*_rive. Enough on board storage to hold everythin

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Bill Prince
On board _*H*_eptadekillion (byte) _*D*_isk _*D*_rive. Enough on board storage to hold everything currently digitized. bp On 2/4/2015 5:25 PM, Nate Burke wrote: The HDD is referring to the Proprietary SSD that's inside the unit. It cashes a copy of the whole internet, that's why it's so fas

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Bill Prince
Doh! bp On 2/4/2015 5:25 PM, Nate Burke wrote: The 3rd is for the GPS Antenna for Sync.

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Mike Hammett
2:50 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X So what's with the 3 antenna connectors on top? The little video only shows using the two outside. What would the third one be for? And what does HDD stand for? Hybrid Division Duplex? Hoaky Division Duplex? Haquioktaha Division Duplex? bp On 2/4/201

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Nate Burke
The 3rd is for the GPS Antenna for Sync. The HDD is referring to the Proprietary SSD that's inside the unit. It cashes a copy of the whole internet, that's why it's so fast, it only has to tell the far radio what video to stream out the Ethernet port. On 2/4/2015 7:22 PM, Bill Prince wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Bill Prince
So what's with the 3 antenna connectors on top? The little video only shows using the two outside. What would the third one be for? And what does HDD stand for? Hybrid Division Duplex? Hoaky Division Duplex? Haquioktaha Division Duplex? bp On 2/4/2015 3:58 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: Wow, $80

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Mike Hammett
2015 5:58:03 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X Wow, $800+antennas for a FPGA-based link that can do 400mbit down / 100mbit up and feed internet to a lot of people. Many of the cheaper licensed links you buy today don't hit that 1-way speed, and they cost $800 for the antennas alone. Bravo

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Colin Stanners
Wow, $800+antennas for a FPGA-based link that can do 400mbit down / 100mbit up and feed internet to a lot of people. Many of the cheaper licensed links you buy today don't hit that 1-way speed, and they cost $800 for the antennas alone. Bravo Ubiquiti. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Chuck McCown

[AFMUG] Airfiber X

2015-02-04 Thread Chuck McCown
$399.99 per end

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Jerry Richardson (airCloud)
’ and 3’ dish? Thing would be 7’ tall! From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 1:17 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X I don't think it's a Nanostation form factor... it says "world-breaking range", r

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Mathew Howard
I don't think it's a Nanostation form factor... it says "world-breaking range", range would be pretty limited with something like that. Then again, I'm not sure how much range you need to break the world, but it sounds like a bad idea anyway. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Eric Muehleisen
If the picture in the email ad is any indication, it looks more like a nanostation form factor. Wouldn't that limit it's antenna size back down into sub 5ghz land? On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > If not Streakwave, I would bet that you could find someone else that would >

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Mathew Howard
If not Streakwave, I would bet that you could find someone else that would be willing to sell them to a HAM... worst case, you could probably buy one from a reseller in another country. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > Wonder if streakwave would even sell it to a ham oper

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Wonder if streakwave would even sell it to a ham operator if they show them the HAMlicense? Might be worth experimenting with the band anyways... So we would know if its worth pushing regulatory changes over. Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 4

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Peter Kranz
.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Keefe John Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:39 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X airfiber 10 ghz? On 2/2/2015 1:38 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: Yes. � Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwire

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel White
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser > Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 1:04 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X > > Can a Ham radio operator use 10ghz today? Maybe they could use the 10ghz > ptp stuff when it becomes availiable... >

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 2/2/15 12:04, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: Can a Ham radio operator use 10ghz today? Yep, for noncommercial use. ~Seth

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Mike Hammett
February 2, 2015 2:04:27 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Can a Ham radio operator use 10ghz today? Maybe they could use the 10ghz ptp stuff when it becomes availiable... Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com te

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Can a Ham radio operator use 10ghz today? Maybe they could use the 10ghz ptp stuff when it becomes availiable... Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com tel. 419-562-6405 fax. 419-617-0110 > On Feb 2, 2015, at 1:59 PM, S

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 2/2/15 11:44, Keefe John wrote: Yes that would be a shame. I don't think Ubiquiti put in comments in support of the 10 ghz petition so a 10 ghz product would be surprising. I wouldn't be surprised; it says "global wisp industry" in the email and plenty of other countries can use 10GHz tod

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Jerry Richardson (airCloud)
Considering the description was for worldwide support, I assume this is for the other 6.8 billion inhabitants of earth… LOL From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Keefe John Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:44 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Yes that

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Keefe John
Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *"Keefe John" *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Monday, February 2, 2015 1:39:25 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X airfiber 10 ghz? On 2/2/2015 1:38 PM, Peter Kranz wro

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Well we couldn't yet use that here in the states. Not yet, anyway. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Keefe John" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 1:39:25 PM Subject: Re: [AF

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Keefe John
mug.com] *On Behalf Of *Keefe John *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2015 11:23 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Anyone have any ideas what it is? On 2/2/2015 1:20 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: Is this being announced at Animal Farm???

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Peter Kranz
02, 2015 11:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Anyone have any ideas what it is? On 2/2/2015 1:20 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: Is this being announced at Animal Farm???

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Mike Hammett
:37 PM Subject: [AFMUG] AirFiber X Is this being announced at Animal Farm???

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Bill Prince
What's the X stand for? 10? 10 GHz? 10 Gbps? Or is it just "the unknown" sort of like the X-files? bp On 2/2/2015 11:20 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote: Is this being announced at Animal Farm???

Re: [AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread Keefe John
Anyone have any ideas what it is? On 2/2/2015 1:20 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: Is this being announced at Animal Farm???

[AFMUG] AirFiber X

2015-02-02 Thread SmarterBroadband
Is this being announced at Animal Farm???