Re: [AFMUG] Ceragon IP20C RSTP

2016-10-03 Thread Jason McKemie
I defined link costs on the mikrotik bridge ports. I can't remember exactly what the setup on the Ceragon is like. Will it pass data without a root bridge being defined? The link appeared to be working otherwise. On Monday, October 3, 2016, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Edit: or defined link costs? > >

Re: [AFMUG] Ceragon IP20C RSTP

2016-10-03 Thread Josh Reynolds
Edit: or defined link costs? On Oct 3, 2016 5:52 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: > Have you defined a root bridge? > > On Oct 3, 2016 3:12 PM, "Jason McKemie" > wrote: > >> Is there any special config necessary to get this working? The interface >> shows that it is sending but not receiving. The bac

Re: [AFMUG] Ceragon IP20C RSTP

2016-10-03 Thread Josh Reynolds
Have you defined a root bridge? On Oct 3, 2016 3:12 PM, "Jason McKemie" wrote: > Is there any special config necessary to get this working? The interface > shows that it is sending but not receiving. The backup link, which is > Ubiquiti, shows both sending and receiving rstp info, and thus is ta

[AFMUG] Ceragon IP20C RSTP

2016-10-03 Thread Jason McKemie
Is there any special config necessary to get this working? The interface shows that it is sending but not receiving. The backup link, which is Ubiquiti, shows both sending and receiving rstp info, and thus is taking the active role.