Re: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-11-01 Thread Joe Novak
- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:00 PM > To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> > Subject: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey > > I want to do a more flexible/standard setup for my DHCP h

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-10-31 Thread Charles Boening
] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:00 PM To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey I want to do a more flexible/standard setup for my DHCP handouts. I hand out public IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack to each customer router fr

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-10-31 Thread Jesse DuPont
Sterling, When we did DHCP, we did have a pair of centralized servers, both running ISC DHCP on Linux. The configs on the two servers have to be nearly identical (except for the declarations about the server ID and the server role) so I ran an NFS share between

[AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-10-31 Thread Sterling Jacobson
I want to do a more flexible/standard setup for my DHCP handouts. I hand out public IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack to each customer router from two main routers on my network. Is it best to create two redundant DHCP servers instead and use DHCP Relay on-net to them? And how is everyone doing that?