Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

2018-05-31 Thread Adam Moffett
Wellnobody expects *us *to be humidifier experts.  It might be unfair to call the humidifier people stupid just because they didn't know FCC rules.  I hope for their sake they made more than $590,380 on the humidifiers they sold while they were out of compliance. -Adam On 5/31/2018 2:09 P

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

2018-05-31 Thread chuck
I didn’t read the complaint very carefully. Is that what it was? I presumed it was an unintentional radiator issue, not wifi. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 12:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590,380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier It is

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

2018-05-31 Thread Eric Kuhnke
It is pretty weird they would choose a noncompliant 2.4/5 GHz wifi module for their products, when plenty of fully compliant packaged modules are available from manufacturers in China. They were either ignorant, stupid, or trying to save 18 cents per manufactured unit. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

2018-05-31 Thread chuck
I am curious, where is the lower frequency limit for part 15? Or do all electronics sold in the retail space need to be tested for emi etc? From: Tim Hardy Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 11:20 AM To: Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590,380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier Well, it was l

[AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

2018-05-31 Thread Tim Hardy
Well, it was little more than just the humidifier but the fines ramp up if you continue to violate the rules even after you have been made aware of the violation. Think this one is an F you, strong message to follow! FCC-18-67A1.pdf