Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Bill Prince
I think the tube is not pressurized, but evacuated; or at least partially evacuated. Air gets in the way... bp On 5/11/2016 5:49 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: What could possibly go wrong with a 750 MPH train in a pressurized plastic tube elevated above the ground in a major earthquake zone? On

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Jaime Solorza
Guess no one but me remembers Forbidden Planet? Just about everything in that movie is around today... On May 11, 2016 7:51 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > We just need Futurama transport tubes. > > On 5/11/2016 8:47 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: > > OOO...even better. > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:2

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread George Skorup
We just need Futurama transport tubes. On 5/11/2016 8:47 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: OOO...even better. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Eric Kuhnke > wrote: not pressurized, near-vaccum evacuated (about the same air pressure as 48 km high in the atmosphe

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Cameron Crum
OOO...even better. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > not pressurized, near-vaccum evacuated (about the same air pressure as 48 > km high in the atmosphere). > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: > >> What could possibly go wrong with a 750 MPH train in

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Eric Kuhnke
not pressurized, near-vaccum evacuated (about the same air pressure as 48 km high in the atmosphere). On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: > What could possibly go wrong with a 750 MPH train in a pressurized plastic > tube elevated above the ground in a major earthquake zone? > >

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Jaime Solorza
Exactly.. but stop making sense On May 11, 2016 6:50 PM, "Cameron Crum" wrote: > What could possibly go wrong with a 750 MPH train in a pressurized plastic > tube elevated above the ground in a major earthquake zone? > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Jaime Solorza > wrote: > >> 0 to 400 mph

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Cameron Crum
What could possibly go wrong with a 750 MPH train in a pressurized plastic tube elevated above the ground in a major earthquake zone? On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop > > http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2

[AFMUG] OT: 0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop

2016-05-11 Thread Jaime Solorza
0 to 400 mph in two seconds: Welcome to the age of hyperloop http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/05/11/hyperloop-one-debuts-future-tech-nevada-desert/84236120/