Re: [AFMUG] OT. Really?

2015-12-10 Thread George Skorup
We should give Guzman's guys a free air lift to Iraq and Syria.. and then bomb both of them. Savages are savages no matter who or what they're fighting for. The enemy of my enemy is NOT my friend. On 12/10/2015 10:58 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Yep...funny if they went after them On Dec 10, 20

Re: [AFMUG] OT. Really?

2015-12-10 Thread Jaime Solorza
Yep...funny if they went after them On Dec 10, 2015 9:42 PM, "Jay Weekley" wrote: > Is there an entity left that doesn't want to destroy ISIS? > > Jaime Solorza wrote: > >> >> >> http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2015/12/10/looks-like-it-on-chapo-guzman-threatens-war-on-isis-after-terrorists

Re: [AFMUG] OT. Really?

2015-12-10 Thread Jay Weekley
Is there an entity left that doesn't want to destroy ISIS? Jaime Solorza wrote: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2015/12/10/looks-like-it-on-chapo-guzman-threatens-war-on-isis-after-terrorists-destroy/?cmpid=GoogleNewsEditorsPicks&google_editors_picks=true

[AFMUG] OT. Really?

2015-12-10 Thread Jaime Solorza
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2015/12/10/looks-like-it-on-chapo-guzman-threatens-war-on-isis-after-terrorists-destroy/?cmpid=GoogleNewsEditorsPicks&google_editors_picks=true

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Ken Hohhof
@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service Reading between the lines... We built 740 of those beasts back when we thought we were going to fight Russia.� 76 of them are still in service. I'm also thinking about our spending on fancy new bombers seems simil

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Bill Prince
That would be too simple and too cheap. Something that our current military can't quite get it's brain around. bp On 12/7/2015 7:33 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: Maybe they should just make an updated B52 rather than reinventing the wheel.

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Adam Moffett
Reading between the lines... We built 740 of those beasts back when we thought we were going to fight Russia. 76 of them are still in service. I'm also thinking about our spending on fancy new bombers seems similar to our Littoral Combat Ship, Crusader artillery, and similar programs where t

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Josh Luthman
ent:* Monday, December 07, 2015 8:13 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service > > Really a remarkable machine! > > "the B-2, with its delicate radar-evading coating, had to be stored in a > climate-controlled hangar to be eff

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Chuck McCown
Well, a map and an altimeter will keep you out of the mountains... From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service Really a remarkable machine! "the B-2, with its delicate radar-evading coating

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Chuck McCown
I am certain I have an anvil over 100 years old. Have not had to upgrade it a single time. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:06 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service Imagine if you had active equipment in your network that was

Re: [AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Josh Luthman
Really a remarkable machine! "the B-2, with its delicate radar-evading coating, had to be stored in a climate-controlled hangar to be effective, and its sensors at first could not tell a storm cloud from a mountain" You could say someone dropped the bomb on that one... Josh Luthman Office: 937-

[AFMUG] OT - really old equipment still in service

2015-12-07 Thread Ken Hohhof
Imagine if you had active equipment in your network that was first produced in 1952, the last ones were built in 1964, and you didn't expect to retire them until at least 2040, because none of the intended replacements had worked out. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/us/b-52s-us-air-force-bombe