Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 6:54 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>
>
>
> I have been talking about this model for 3 or 4 years now, literally ever
> since the horns went into testing.
>
>
>
> It seems so simple, but between their beamwi
I should get a real estate license then. We have a lot of these locations.
Just got 4 more last week.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 6:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
I have been talking about
n’t think it’s the only
> game in town any longer by any stretch.
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds
> *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 3:26 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>
>
>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
Micro. Pops.
That's where the distributed low cost APs make sense (where you can of course).
On Jul 21, 2017 4:02 PM, "Joe Falaschi"
mailto:listm...@wi.net>> wrote:
What Chris said.
> Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:58 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>
> I've had ePMP's do some weird things here and there, like refusing to
> reboot or accept config changes. Nothing a power cycle didn&#
m: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On
>> Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:58 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>>
>> I've ha
veniences like remote spectrum analyzer, RF
> private IP, and SM proxy access via AP.
>
> So overall my experiences say the 450 is better than the ePMP, but I still
> use a lot of ePMP for all the reasons others have stated. ePMP is good
> bang for the buck.
>
> -Adam
>
&g
; Chris Wright
> Network Administrator
>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On
> Behalf Of Adam Moffett
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:58 AM
> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>
Network Administrator
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:58 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
I've had ePMP's do some weird things here and there, like refusing to reboot or
accept config changes.
but I
still use a lot of ePMP for all the reasons others have stated. ePMP is
good bang for the buck.
-Adam
-- Original Message --
From: "Mathew Howard"
To: "af"
Sent: 7/18/2017 10:23:17 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
It seems to me (as someon
t;> What QoS settings in the SM?
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Wright
>>
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 1:36 PM
>> *To:* af@afmu
ehalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 1:36 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>
>
>
> Yes. Just yesterday tested a 450i AP (40mhz) with a 20mb 450 SM. Linktests
> showed 137 x 58 but most we could burst to was 52 x 45. Both AP
What QoS settings in the SM?
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 1:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
Yes. Just yesterday tested a 450i AP (40mhz) with a 20mb
Yes. Just yesterday tested a 450i AP (40mhz) with a 20mb 450 SM. Linktests
showed 137 x 58 but most we could burst to was 52 x 45. Both AP and SM are
on 15.1.
I currently have a support ticket open for this as well as increased DFS
issues.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
We setup a customer on a very lightly loaded 5ghz PMP450 AP and SM, 20mhz
channel, expecting them to burst up to 70mbit speeds for download; linktest
is reliably 85-90d and there's effectively no other usage. But we can't
seem to get over 50mbit speedtests. Has anyone else seen such issues?
15 matches
Mail list logo
