I'm pretty sure that's their plan since its a software defined radio.
On Saturday, September 27, 2014, Jeremy Grip via Af wrote:
> I notice looking at PMP450 specs that there are two separate units in
> 3GHz, one for 3300-3600 and one for 3550-3800. Does that mean we’re liable
> to be able to u
I would say that is likely Jeremy.
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+paulm=pdmnet@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Grip via Af
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 8:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 in 3.55?
I notice looking at PMP450 specs that there are two separate units in 3GHz, one
I notice looking at PMP450 specs that there are two separate units in 3GHz, one
for 3300-3600 and one for 3550-3800. Does that mean we’re liable to be able to
utilize the lower 100 when (if?) we get shared 3550-3650 on that platform?
They’d be able to implement robust compliant DFS on it—it’s a
