Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Josh Luthman
If the noise is -73 you're at 10 snr... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jul 15, 2015 10:48 AM, "Daniel Gerlach" wrote: > yes still -63 > > 2015-07-15 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sean Heskett : > > Hummm that sprctrum looks much better and I'd

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Daniel Gerlach
yes still -63 2015-07-15 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sean Heskett : > Hummm that sprctrum looks much better and I'd expect it to perform a lot > better too. > > What's the recieve signal? Still -63? > > On Wednesday, July 15, 2015, Daniel Gerlach wrote: >> >> the spectrum is now without peaks, but low band

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Sean Heskett
Hummm that sprctrum looks much better and I'd expect it to perform a lot better too. What's the recieve signal? Still -63? On Wednesday, July 15, 2015, Daniel Gerlach wrote: > the spectrum is now without peaks, but low bandwith.. > > 2015-07-15 15:37 GMT+02:00 Sean Heskett >: > > On the "loca

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Sean Heskett
On the "local" side you have a lot of noise. Although the the "constant" noise on the channel shows as -90-ish (shown as the solid blue bars) the radio is seeing -70-ish peak noise (shown as the black I beams). Your receive signal is -63 so you only have about 10db signal above the noise. If you

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Daniel Gerlach
thx david i will try 2015-07-15 15:26 GMT+02:00 David : > I would try link planner with all 4 links in there with the PTP-sync > selected and see what you get. > If they are all ptp600 then using ptpsync with them should help to resolve > any near/close interference of your self on the tower > >

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread David
I would try link planner with all 4 links in there with the PTP-sync selected and see what you get. If they are all ptp600 then using ptpsync with them should help to resolve any near/close interference of your self on the tower On 07/15/2015 08:01 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote: link planner told

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Lewis Bergman
Did you enter an appropriate interference db? On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 7:12 AM Daniel Gerlach wrote: > with idfs same low bandwith..we have on this tower 4 PTP 600 maybe we > should TDM Traffic? > > 2015-07-15 15:01 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gerlach : > > link planner tolds me 240 mbit and that is what i ne

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Daniel Gerlach
with idfs same low bandwith..we have on this tower 4 PTP 600 maybe we should TDM Traffic? 2015-07-15 15:01 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gerlach : > link planner tolds me 240 mbit and that is what i need :( i will try idfs > > > 2015-07-15 15:00 GMT+02:00 David : >> Unfortunately I do not think there is an upg

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Daniel Gerlach
link planner tolds me 240 mbit and that is what i need :( i will try idfs 2015-07-15 15:00 GMT+02:00 David : > Unfortunately I do not think there is an upgrade to expand the band on the > PTP600. > Depending on how much throughput you really need you could try a smaller > channel size. > > > > On

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread David
Unfortunately I do not think there is an upgrade to expand the band on the PTP600. Depending on how much throughput you really need you could try a smaller channel size. On 07/15/2015 07:50 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote: can somebody have a look on the pictures and can tell why the modulation is s

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread David
Definitely looks as if there is some interference possibly some OOB from some adj site On 07/15/2015 07:50 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote: can somebody have a look on the pictures and can tell why the modulation is so low :( spectrum is free..and LOS what does this peaks can be.. THX a lot

Re: [AFMUG] PTP 600 5.8 ghz Problem

2015-07-15 Thread Lewis Bergman
Why do you have the frequency fixed ? It says you have issues with the wireless conditions. If you have LOS then it is either multipath or interference. Why not set it to applied freq changes and let it do it's magic? On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 6:50 AM Daniel Gerlach wrote: > can somebody have a look