gt; If they are riddled with tiny holes, I’m guessing they are very old, or
> somebody cut corners.
>
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 3:00 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
>
>
> I don't know about fragile. I
.
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 3:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
I don't know about fragile. I have a 300 for tier right next to my building.
Last winter I listened to huge chunks of ice fall on it as it thawed for two
days. Forth day I went
I don't know about fragile. I have a 300 for tier right next to my
building. Last winter I listened to huge chunks of ice fall on it as it
thawed for two days. Forth day I went up to take a look. I couldn't tell
anything had ever happened to it. Looked as good as new with the exception
of a bit dir
Gotcha! They don’t like expensive roofs that look nice, just expensive roofs
that don’t leak. ☺
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:53 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
Ones that don't leak at any rate
Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:59 AM
>
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
>
>
>
> My building is about 6000 sqft and five years ago it cost about $90k to
> put mine on.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 8:37 AM Jaime Solorza
> wrote:
>
On 7/15/15 12:27, James Howard wrote:
So you�re telling us that aside from being obsessive they also like
REALLY expensive roofs?
I get that the attraction is you can have water pond in them and it
won't leak, but they are really fragile for the price. I frequently see
them riddled with ti
So you're telling us that aside from being obsessive they also like REALLY
expensive roofs?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:59 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
My building is about 6000 sqft and five
My building is about 6000 sqft and five years ago it cost about $90k to put
mine on.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 8:37 AM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2015 7:58 AM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
>
>> On 7/15/15 6:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>
>>> Customers with that type of roof are often obsessive.
>>>
>
Right across they mounted mast Same type roof
On Jul 15, 2015 7:58 AM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
> On 7/15/15 6:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
>> Customers with that type of roof are often obsessive.
>>
>
>
> That's putting it far too nicely.
>
> ~Seth
>
On 7/15/15 6:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Customers with that type of roof are often obsessive.
That's putting it far too nicely.
~Seth
, July 15, 2015 8:05 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
That is a TPL roof. I put one on a few years ago and it is very expensive.
Having said that, a non poem mount works on them just like anything else.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 8:14 PM Jaime Solorza wrote:
Saw this on top of
That is a TPL roof. I put one on a few years ago and it is very expensive.
Having said that, a non poem mount works on them just like anything else.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 8:14 PM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Saw this on top of an Army barracks. Installed by Chaparral Wireless
> Internet. Not someth
looks like a 8 yr old did the install
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Justin Wilson - MTIN
wrote:
> Looks like a rubber roof. I bet they had all sorts of comments about not
> doing anything to that rubber roof. Anytime i ever had a rubber membrane
> roof it was always pointed out how “fra
Looks like a rubber roof. I bet they had all sorts of comments about not doing
anything to that rubber roof. Anytime i ever had a rubber membrane roof it was
always pointed out how “fragile” that roof was and how expensive it was. Sure
a mount like the other one with a longer mast would have
14 matches
Mail list logo
