[AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

Looking to deliver to 4 locations with 4 HD Cameras on each location. Need probably about 25-35 mbps UPLOAD per location. This will be in a small plaza in Taos NM Sam -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

I have not used Radwin jet (and don't know what it is), but I have used Radwin 1000 and Radwin 2000. If they have a link budget calculator for the Jet, then go by that rather than the spec sheet. The number in the spec sheet is probably not achievable in real life. On 10/9/2015 12:09 PM, Sa

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

"Jet" is the 802.11 tweak that was originated at Ligowave. It is somewhat analogous to AirMax on UBNT equipment (not the same or compatible by any means). I thought I heard that Ligowave & Radwin merged or something a while back? bp On 10/9/2015 9:09 AM, Sam Lambie wrote: Looking to deliver

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:18:42 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance? > I have not used Radwin jet (and don't know what it is), but I have used Radwin > 1000 and Radwin 2000. > If they have a link budget calculator for the Jet, then

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

ber 9, 2015 12:18:42 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts > onperformance? > > I have not used Radwin jet (and don't know what it is), but I have used > Radwin 1000 and Radwin 2000. > > If they have a link budget calculator for the Jet

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

18 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net *From: *"Adam Moffett" *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Friday, October 9, 2015 12:18:42 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

*af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Friday, October 9, 2015 12:18:42 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts > onperformance? > > I have not used Radwin jet (and don't know what it is), but I have used > Radwin 1000 and Radwin 2000. > > If they have

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

Telecom >> 7266 SW 48 Street >> Miami, FL 33155 >> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >> >> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net >> >> -------------- >> >> *From: *"Adam Moffett" >> *To: *af@afmug

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

;>> >>> Faisal Imtiaz >>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>> Miami, FL 33155 >>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>> >>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net >>> >>> --

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

t;> >>>> >>>> On 10/9/2015 9:39 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: >>>> >>>> Radwin Jet is there PTMP AP with beam forming. >>>> >>>> >>>> Faisal Imtiaz >>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>&

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

This is the perfect deployment scenario for the radwin 5000. You'll get that upload. Play with R-planner (or get a sales rep to do it for you if learning its not-as-intuitive-as-it-looks-like-it-should-be interface isn't getting you anywhere) and, just like cambium's link planner, if you don't ge

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance?

sh Luthman" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:39:58 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Jet. Anyone using it yet? Thoughts on performance? Claims are 120. In a good environment that's possible. I get 5 bits/hz on strong links. Bad links of 70 and 75 I'm seeing 4 bit