Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc
WTF. Good grief. Don’t know why I am thinking its 5ms. Maybe it’s the 430’s that are 5ms. Tyson Burris, President Internet Communications Inc. 739 Commerce Dr. Franklin, IN 46131 317-738-0320 Daytime # 317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # Online: www.surfici.net What can ICI do for

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Josh Luthman
Did you start along with Jamie already this morning? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 7, 2016 9:31 AM, "Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc" < t...@franklinisp.net> wrote: > WTF. Good grief. Don’t know why I am thinking

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc
by unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly prohibited. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 9:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Cc: memb...@wispa.org Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Spam:***, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question Did you start

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Mathew Howard
ntial and protected from disclosure. Any review,* > *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by* > *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly* > *prohibited.* > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Bill Prince
n...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 9:34 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Cc:* memb...@wispa.org <mailto:memb...@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Spam:***, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question Did you start al

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Sriram Chaturvedi
f@afmug.com>> Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 10:32 AM To: AFMUG mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Spam:***, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question Pretty sure 900 FSK is 2.5 ms as well. Only the 3650 stuff was 5 ms. The PMP450 made it optional. bp On 4/7/2016 7:33 AM, Mathe

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Bill Prince
ril 07, 2016 10:32 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question Pretty sure 900 FSK is 2.5 ms as well. Only the 3650 stuff was 5 ms. The PMP450 made it optional. bp On 4/7/2016 7:33 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: I think 900mhz FSK

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

2016-04-07 Thread Ken Hohhof
I think FSK 900 was double the frame size as the other FSK, so 5 ms. I think due to the narrower channel. Also the WiMAX 3 GHz stuff. From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 10:32 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Spam:***, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question Pretty sure 900 FSK