Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016

;li...@smarterbroadband.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:59 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016 > > > We have a Runcom kit from last year. Very poor results in testing. At > Wispapalooza, the CEO of Runcom said the issue was wi

Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016

No but you can rent them equipment I think. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:52 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016 One of the problems with experimental licenses is that I don’t believe you are allowed to charge end users for service. From

Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016

@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016 We have a Runcom kit from last year. Very poor results in testing. At Wispapalooza, the CEO of Runcom said the issue was with the Base Station Antennas they originally sent and he would send me new ones. Never received anything. Adam

Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016

One of the problems with experimental licenses is that I don’t believe you are allowed to charge end users for service. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 3:21 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016 The 450i can't do 6mhz, but they can do 5mhz channels. If I

Re: [AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016

It seems like the regulatory environment around these bands is a little shaky. I always figured that was why. On Monday, February 1, 2016, Adam Moffett wrote: > I've wondered why the major fixed wireless players never touched this. > > Wasn't there supposed to be a SAS

[AFMUG] TVWS equipment in 2016

If you've recently purchased any tvws equipment or received price quotes from a vendor, please contact me off list... It is looking increasingly like I could describe the current state of equipment available as "half baked prototypes". There has been a lot of noise and hot air but very little