ot;
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:37:30 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] US Scientists Object to iRobot
Derp... hit send before including my link where I got that quote.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/04/10/irobot-roomba-lawnmower-astronomer/
-Steve D
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:36 AM, St
Derp... hit send before including my link where I got that quote.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/04/10/irobot-roomba-lawnmower-astronomer/
-Steve D
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Steve D wrote:
> That article was light on details. They want in on a piece of 6GHz
> frequency that radio astrono
That article was light on details. They want in on a piece of 6GHz
frequency that radio astronomers have been using.
Unfortunately, iRobot wants its beacons to broadcast data in the 6240-6740
> MHz range. That's the same frequency the National Radio Astronomy
> Observatory (NRAO) is using to wat
Are they trying to get a waiver for use in exclusion zones?
On Monday, April 13, 2015, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> http://www.dispatchtimes.com/irobot-seeking-fcc-approval-of-fixed-wireless-infrastructure-for-its-robotic-lawn-mower/2076/
>
> I must be missing something here. I don't see what makes t
http://www.dispatchtimes.com/irobot-seeking-fcc-approval-of-fixed-wireless-infrastructure-for-its-robotic-lawn-mower/2076/
I must be missing something here. I don't see what makes this iRobot any
different than anything else from an RF perspective.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computin