http://www.mini-box.com/picoPSU-160-XT
On 1/23/17 1:08 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
You guys and your DC power... Sheesh.
On Jan 23, 2017 3:07 PM, "George Skorup" mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
That thing would be so much better with a DC power supply.
On 1/23/2017 2:35 PM, Seth Mattin
They do make a DC version of the short 2U chassis Justin suggested, but it
runs on -48V:
https://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/2U/523/SC523L-410.cfm
I'll look into the Supermicro units. I've also been looking at the Dell
R210 II, which is only 15.5" deep and seems to be pretty inexpensive t
You guys and your DC power... Sheesh.
On Jan 23, 2017 3:07 PM, "George Skorup" wrote:
> That thing would be so much better with a DC power supply.
>
> On 1/23/2017 2:35 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
>>
>> This would fit in 1U with 12" of depth:
>>
>> https://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/50
That thing would be so much better with a DC power supply.
On 1/23/2017 2:35 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
This would fit in 1U with 12" of depth:
https://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/5018/sys-5018a-ftn4.cfm
On 1/23/17 11:35, Christopher Gray wrote:
I've got two remotely located networks with space-restricted sites where
I could install a shallow rack-mount server for some simple VMs.
Specifically, One site is restricted to about 20" deep and 4U, and
another restricted to about 12" deep and 1U. I wo
It depends on the topology of your network, but if you want to do this, put
a few 1U shallow depth supermicros or similar out at the far edge of your
network. The farthest POP from your core. Doesn't have to be expensive,
even a 4 year old model is fine as long as it can run the latest
debian-testi
We do a lot of tunnels back to a few data centers and an Amazon instance.
If you are talking Radius it’s always good to have one one-site at least.
I like these:
http://www.acmemicro.com/Product/2923/Supermicro-SC523L-520B-2U-Chassis-14-5-in-Depth-2x3-5-in-Internal-Front-I-O-ATX-520W-Black-CSE-5
When working with a smaller remotely located network, is your preference to
install a server on that network for monitoring and such, or to just tunnel
back to your main location for monitoring?
I've got two remotely located networks with space-restricted sites where I
could install a shallow rack
